Aviation News, Headlines & Alerts
 
NTSB: No Rush to Judge

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/airflight/www/www/wp-content/themes/fluida/includes/loop.php on line 270

NTSB: No Rush to Judge

George’s Point of View

As urgent as the idea of an NTSB recommendation sounds, there is apparently no rush. The latest NTSB safety recommendation to EASA is rooted in a 2001 crash: American Airlines Airbus Flight 587. (see narrative below)

Probable cause of this accident was the in-flight separation of the vertical stabilizer as a result of the loads beyond ultimate design that were created by the first officer’s unnecessary and excessive rudder pedal inputs. (i.e. The pilot used the rudder and it fell off.)

(To put this into simplistic car terms, your car just skidded on some ice. You did some fancy and extreme steering which may or may not have been necessary. And the steering wheel just came off in your hands. Pretty much all you can do now is spectate and die.)

The pilot’s unnecessary and excessive rudder pedal input was based on a violent wake turbulence encounter. The pilot’s “unnecessary and excessive” rudder pedal input broke the rudder.

Isn’t this a dubious conclusion? Isn’t this like blaming a car crash on a driver hitting brakes too hard? The airbus had just taken off and encountered turbulence. Since when do flight controls not handle “aggressive input”?

Initial suggestions included pilot retraining. (I.E. don’t fix the problem, train the pilots to work around it.) This month, the NTSB encouraged modification of European certification standards. In other words, the NTSB wants to physically limit the rudder movement to what the design can safely manage. Maybe that makes more sense than expecting a pilot engaged in a desperate struggle to save a failing plane to have to make accommodations for flighty flight controls.

Some take the angle that the problem lies in the rudder design and/or composition. In 2001, the FAA was one of those so inclined.

On November 16, 2001, the FAA issued emergency AD 2001-23-51 warning of failure of the vertical stabilizer-to-fuselage attachment fittings, transverse (side) load fittings, or rudder-to-vertical stabilizer attachment fittings, if not corrected, could result in loss of the vertical stabilizer and/or rudder and consequent loss of control of the airplane. The FAA considers that, before structural failure, it may be possible to detect indications of possible failure modes that could result in separation of the vertical stabilizer from the airplane. These indications include edge delaminations, cracked paint, surface distortions, other surface damage, and failure of the transverse (side) load fittings. Similarly, indications of failure of the rudder assembly, which could lead to failure of the vertical stabilizer, may also be detectable with such an inspection.

This failure has happened more than once.

In the Air Transat flight 961 incident (also a 300 series Airbus) out of Varadero, Cuba, the rudder disintegrated. The pilot in that flight questions the integrity of the rudder design and composition.

Here another point that has been commonly made. Aircraft have had rudders made of aluminum for 70 years without them disintegrating. With high tech composites, planes are falling out of the sky.

In March 2006, US safety investigators recommended rudder inspections on Airbus A300-600 jets because a FedEx A300-600 rudder damaged during maintenance.

Tested on the ground by Fed Ex engineers, in the Fed-Ex A300 cargo plane, the hydraulic system which actuates the rudder tore a hole around the hinges exactly where the rudders of both flight 961 and flight 587 did. Coincidence? I think not.

Does the certification process need an overhaul? I think so.

Have a couple of dead pilots again become convenient scapegoats for/by using the very computer controlled flight control system that they believed protected them? I bet I know what the pilots think.

Flight 587, Official NTSB narrative of the crash
On November 12, 2001, about 0916:15 eastern standard time, American Airlines flight 587, an Airbus Industrie A300-605R, N14053, crashed into a residential area of Belle Harbor, New York, shortly after takeoff from John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), Jamaica, New York. Flight 587 was a regularly scheduled passenger flight to Las Americas International Airport, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, with 2 flight crewmembers, 7 flight attendants, and 251 passengers aboard the airplane. The airplane’s vertical stabilizer and rudder separated in flight and were found in Jamaica Bay, about 1 mile north of the main wreckage site. The airplane’s engines subsequently separated in flight and were found several blocks north and east of the main wreckage site. All 260 people aboard the airplane and 5 people on the ground were killed, and the airplane was destroyed by impact forces and a postcrash fire. Flight 587 was operating under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 121 on an instrument flight rules flight plan. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident.

The accident airplane arrived at JFK about 2231 on the night before the accident. The airplane had been flown from San Jose, Costa Rica, to JFK with an intermediate stop in Miami International Airport, Miami, Florida. During postaccident interviews, the pilots of the flight leg from MIA to JFK indicated that the flight was smooth and uneventful.

Flight 587 was the first leg of a 1-day roundtrip sequence for the flight crew. American Airlines records indicated that the captain checked in for the flight about 0614 and that the first officer checked in about 0630. The gate agent working the flight arrived at the departure gate about 0645. She stated that the flight attendants were already aboard the airplane at that time and that the captain and the first officer arrived at the gate about 0700.

About 0710, the airplane fueling process began. The airplane fueler indicated that, during the fueling process, he saw one of the pilots perform an exterior inspection of the airplane. He finished the fueling process about 0745 and stated that he saw nothing unusual regarding the airplane.

Statements provided to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Police Department by American Airlines maintenance and avionics personnel indicated that, sometime between 0730 and 0800, the captain reported that the number 2 pitch trim and yaw damper system would not engage. Two avionics technicians were sent to the airplane to investigate the problem. They performed an auto flight system (AFS) check, which indicated a fault with the number 2 flight augmentation computer. The circuit breaker was then reset, another AFS check was performed, and no fault was detected. In addition, an autoland system check was performed, and that test also did not detect a fault. The avionics technicians estimated that they were in the cockpit for 5 to 7 minutes.

The cockpit voice recorder (CVR) recording began about 0845:35. The CVR indicated that, about 0859:58, the airplane was cleared to push back from the gate. About 0901:33, the ground controller provided the flight crew with taxi instructions to runway 31L, and the first officer acknowledged these instructions. About 0902:05, the captain told the first officer, “your leg, you check the rudders.” (The first officer was the flying pilot, and the captain was the nonflying pilot.) Data from the flight data recorder (FDR) showed that, about 0902:07, the rudder pedal check began. The FDR data also showed that a maximum right rudder pedal deflection of about 3.7 inches was recorded about 0902:11 and that a maximum left rudder pedal deflection of 3.6 inches was recorded about 0902:19. About 0902:23, the first officer responded, “rudders check.” The FDR data showed that the rudder pedals returned to their neutral position about 0902:25.

About 0906:53, the ground controller provided the pilots of Japan Air Lines flight 47, a Boeing 747-400, with taxi instructions to runway 31L. About 0908:01, the ground controller instructed the Japan Air Lines pilots to contact the local (tower) controller. About 0908:58, the ground controller instructed the flight 587 pilots to follow the Japan Air Lines airplane and to contact the local controller. The first officer acknowledged this instruction.

About 0911:08, the local controller cleared the Japan Air Lines airplane for takeoff. About 0911:36, the local controller cautioned the flight 587 pilots about wake turbulence and instructed the pilots to taxi into position and hold for runway 31L. The first officer acknowledged the instruction. About 0913:05, the local controller instructed the Japan Air Lines pilots to fly the bridge climb and to contact the departure controller at the New York Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON). About 0913:21, the flight 587 captain said to the first officer, “you have the airplane.”

About 0913:28, the local controller cleared flight 587 for takeoff, and the captain acknowledged the clearance. About 0913:35, the first officer asked the captain, “you happy with that [separation] distance?” About 3 seconds later, the captain replied, “we’ll be all right once we get rollin’. He’s supposed to be five miles by the time we’re airborne, that’s the idea.” About 0913:46, the first officer said, “so you’re happy.”

The National Transportation Safety Board’s airplane performance study for this accident0 determined that flight 587 started its takeoff roll about 0913:51 and lifted off about 0914:29, which was about 1 minute 40 seconds after the Japan Air Lines airplane. About 0914:43, the local controller instructed the flight 587 pilots to turn left, fly the bridge climb, and contact the New York TRACON departure controller. About 5 seconds later, the captain acknowledged this instruction. Radar data indicated that the airplane climbed to 500 feet above mean sea level (msl) and then entered a climbing left turn to a heading of 220º. About 0915:00, the captain made initial contact with the departure controller, informing him that the airplane was at 1,300 feet msl and climbing to 5,000 feet msl. About 0915:05, the departure controller instructed flight 587 to climb to and maintain 13,000 feet msl, and the captain acknowledged this instruction about 5 seconds later. About 0915:29, the CVR recorded the captain’s statement “clean machine,” indicating that the gear, flaps, and slats had all been retracted.

About 0915:35, flight 587 was climbing through 1,700 feet msl with its wings approximately level. About 1 second later, the departure controller instructed flight 587 to turn left and proceed direct to the WAVEY navigation intersection (located about 30 miles southeast of JFK). About 0915:41, the captain acknowledged the instruction. The controller did not receive any further transmissions from flight 587.

FDR data indicated that, about 0915:36, the airplane experienced a 0.04 G drop in longitudinal load factor, a 0.07 G shift to the left in lateral load factor, and about a 0.3 G drop in normal (vertical) load factor. The airplane performance study found that these excursions were consistent with a wake turbulence encounter. Between 0915:36 and 0915:41, the FDR recorded movement of the control column, control wheel, and rudder pedals. Specifically, the control column moved from approximately 0º (neutral) to 2º nose up, 2º nose down, and back to 0º; the control wheel moved a total of seven times, with peaks at 18º right, 30º left, 37º right, 34º left, 5º left, 21º left, and 23º right, before moving to between 5º and 6º left; and the rudder pedals moved from about 0.1 inch left (the starting point for the pedals) to about 0.1 inch right and 0.2 inch left before moving to 0.1 inch left. The airplane performance study indicated that, during this time, the rudder moved from 0º (neutral) to about 2º left, about 0.6º right, and back to 0º.

During the wake turbulence encounter, the airplane’s pitch angle increased from 9º to 11.5º, decreased to about 10º, and increased again to 11º. The airplane’s bank angle moved from 0º (wings level) to 17º left wing down, which was consistent with the turn to
the WAVEY navigation intersection.

At 0915:44.7, the captain stated, “little wake turbulence, huh?” to which the first officer replied, at 0915:45.6, “yeah.” At 0915:48.2, the first officer indicated that he wanted the airspeed set to 250 knots, which was the maximum speed for flight below 10,000 feet msl. At that point, the airplane was at an altitude of about 2,300 feet msl.

FDR data indicated that, about 0915:51, the load factors began excursions that were similar to those that occurred about 0915:36: the longitudinal load factor dropped from 0.20 to 0.14 G, the lateral load factor shifted 0.05 G to the left, and the normal load factor dropped from 1.0 to 0.6 G. The airplane performance study found that these excursions were also consistent with a wake turbulence encounter. According to the FDR, the airplane’s bank angle moved from 23º to 25º left wing down at 0915:51.5, the control wheel moved to 64º right at 0915:51.5, and the rudder pedals moved to 1.7 inches right at 0915:51.9.

At 0915:51.8, 0915:52.3, and 0915:52.9, the CVR recorded the sound of a thump, a click, and two thumps, respectively. At 0915:54.2, the first officer stated, in a strained voice, “max power.” At that point, the airplane was traveling at 240 knots. About 0915:55, the captain asked, “you all right?” to which the first officer replied, “yeah, I’m fine.” One second later, the captain stated, “hang onto it. Hang onto it.” The CVR recorded the sound of a snap at 0915:56.6, the first officer’s statement “let’s go for power please” at 0915:57.5, and the sound of a loud thump at 0915:57.7. According to the airplane performance study, the vertical stabilizer’s right rear main attachment fitting fractured at 0915:58.4, and the vertical stabilizer separated from the airplane immediately afterward. At 0915:58.5, the CVR recorded the sound of a loud bang. At that time, the airplane was traveling at an airspeed of about 251 knots.

According to the FDR, the rudder pedals moved from 1.7 inches right to 1.7 inches left, 1.7 inches right, 2.0 inches right, 2.4 inches left, and 1.3 inches right between 0915:52 and 0915:58.5. Also, the FDR showed that the control wheel moved 64º to the right at 0915:51.5, 78º (full) to the left at 0915:53.5, 64º to the right at 0915:55.5, and 78º to the left at 0915:56.5.

The airplane performance study estimated that, at 0915:53.2, the rudder was deflected 11º to the left, and the sideslip angle at the airplane’s center of gravity (cg) was about 4º to the left (after peaking temporarily at 5º to the left).21 At 0915:56.8, the rudder was deflected 10.2º to the left, and the sideslip angle was about 7º to the left. At 0915:58.4 (the time that the right rear main attachment fitting fractured), the rudder was deflected between 10º and 11º to the right, the sideslip angle was between 11º and 12º to the right, and the airplane experienced a 0.2 G shift to the right in lateral load factor.

The CVR recorded, at 0916:00.0, a sound similar to a grunt and, 1 second later, the first officer’s statement, “holy [expletive].” At 0916:04.4, the CVR recorded a sound similar to a stall warning repetitive chime, which lasted for 1.9 seconds. At 0916:07.5, the first officer stated, “what the hell are we into…we’re stuck in it.” At 0916:12.8, the captain stated, “get out of it, get out of it.” The CVR recording ended 2 seconds later. The airplane was located at 40º 34′ 37.59″ north latitude and 73º 51′ 01.31″ west longitude. The accident occurred during the hours of daylight.

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Holidaymakers face higher summer air fares due to lack of planes , Ryanair boss warns

Holidaymakers face higher summer air fares due to lack of planes , Ryanair boss warns
Summer holidays could be pricier this year due to a shortage of planes

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



How To Find Out Which Kind Of Plane You’ll Be Flying In On Your Next Flight – SlashGear

How To Find Out Which Kind Of Plane You’ll Be Flying In On Your Next Flight – SlashGear
Every traveler should know the kind of plane they’re boarding. Choosing the right aircraft means greater comfort, quicker travel, and maximum safety in the sky.

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Plane removed after emergency crash landing in Cape Coral

Plane removed after emergency crash landing in Cape Coral
Crews have removed the single-engine plane that crashed near Vogiantzis Parkway in Cape Coral on Saturday morning.

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



You should NEVER walk around a plane if you feel sick, warns expert

You should NEVER walk around a plane if you feel sick, warns expert
MOTION sickness is common when travelling by plane and can spoil the start of your holiday. An expert has warned that you should never walk around the aircraft if you feel sick and has shared seven…

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Three people dead following plane crash in Ohio – KYMA

Three people dead following plane crash in Ohio – KYMA
According to a release from Ohio State Highway Patrol, the three victims have been identified as Daniel Baker of Jackson, Zebulon Logan of Lucasville and Dan Baker of West Portsmouth.

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Plane makes emergency landing on road

Plane makes emergency landing on road
The pilot told authorities when he took off from Pine Shadows Air Park in North Fort Myers, he couldn’t reach 1,500 feet and his engine died.

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Investigation underway into the small plane that crash-landed in a Cape Coral neighborhood

Investigation underway into the small plane that crash-landed in a Cape Coral neighborhood
A small plane crash in Cape Coral is under investigation after the pilot reported engine problems. The plane has been removed from the road.

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



May 2020 plane crash: Investigation report says ‘human error’ caused mishap

May 2020 plane crash: Investigation report says ‘human error’ caused mishap
KARACHI: The final report released by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Board sheds light on the causes behind the tragic crash of Pakistan International Airline’s Airbus A320 nearly four years…

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Army plane overturned in 1949; Armstrong switched from cash to paychecks in 1924 [Lancaster That Was]

Army plane overturned in 1949; Armstrong switched from cash to paychecks in 1924 [Lancaster That Was]
Excerpts and summaries of news stories from the former Intelligencer Journal, Lancaster New Era and Sunday News that focus on the events in the county’s past that are noteworthy, newsworthy

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Pakistan Aircraft Investigation Board reveals reasons behind PIA fatal crash that killed 101 people in 2020

Pakistan Aircraft Investigation Board reveals reasons behind PIA fatal crash that killed 101 people in 2020
According to the report, when the pilots first tried to land the aircraft, its engines hit the ground, which led to the system supplying lubricant to the engines shutting down. The report said that “engine failure” eventually led to the crash.

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Pakistan plane crash in May 2020 blamed on ‘human error’

Pakistan plane crash in May 2020 blamed on ‘human error’
Pakistan plane crash in May 2020 blamed on ‘human error’

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



The VERY sneaky tricks plane passengers are using to board flights early revealed

The VERY sneaky tricks plane passengers are using to board flights early revealed
Experts say a rising number of air travelers have begun using both ethical and unethical tricks to ensure they board the aircraft first including faking disabilities and cutting into lines

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Shot down another Russian A-50 surveillance plane: Ukraine

Shot down another Russian A-50 surveillance plane: Ukraine
Kiev: Ukrainian Air Force Commander Mykola Oleschuk has said that the Ukrainian military shot down another Russian A-50 surveillance aircraft.“I am grateful to

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



A decade after MH370 disappeared, planes still at risk of vanishing off the map

A decade after MH370 disappeared, planes still at risk of vanishing off the map

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Society of the Snow review: Heart-wrenching tale of Andes plane crash survivors

Society of the Snow review: Heart-wrenching tale of Andes plane crash survivors
Nominated for the Academy Award for Best International Feature Film, it captures the desolation of the passengers stranded in the mountains after the 1972 Uruguayan plane disaster

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



SHERIFF: Father, son, and friend killed in plane crash

SHERIFF: Father, son, and friend killed in plane crash
Sheriff Frazier said the family told deputies the three men were en route to Florida to pick up a vehicle Logan purchased.

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Triple Fatal Plane Crash Reported at James A. Rhodes Airport in Jackson County

Triple Fatal Plane Crash Reported at James A. Rhodes Airport in Jackson County
JACKSON, Ohio (February 24, 2024) – Three people were confirmed dead following a plane crash at the James A. Rhodes Airport in Jackson County, Ohio, on Saturday afternoon, according to the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office.

Details of the Incident:

The crash occurred on the afternoon of Februar

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Plane crash at airport in southeastern Ohio leaves 3 dead

Plane crash at airport in southeastern Ohio leaves 3 dead
A fatal crash in Jackson County, Ohio, left three people dead on Saturday, the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office said.

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



What scheme does Plane Jane have in mind for her immunity potion? – GAY TIMES

What scheme does Plane Jane have in mind for her immunity potion? – GAY TIMES
This week’s episode of RuPaul’s Drag Race is a show staple. For the Mini Challenge the library was open (Xunami Muse, deservedly, won) and for the Maxi Challenge it was…

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Three killed in Jackson County plane crash

Three killed in Jackson County plane crash
JACKSON, Ohio (WCMH) — Three people are dead after a plane crash Saturday afternoon in Jackson County. A spokesperson with the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office confirmed that a plane cra…

Read More

To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.



Content not attributed to or linked to original, is the property of AirFlightDisaster.com; all rights reserved.

Site Credits