| | | |

Nebraska: Cockpit Smoke Downs UA Airbus

Similar Posts

  • | | | | |

    Airbus Evacuation in Ft. Lauderdale


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Richard Brownrigg

    What: Spirit Airlines Airbus A319-100 en route from Cartagena Colombia to Ft. Lauderdale
    Where: Ft. Lauderdale
    When: May 30th 2010
    Who: 90 passengers and 5 crew
    Why: On landing, while still on the runway, smoke permeated the cabin, forcing evacuation on to the runway. Three passengers were hospitalized due to injuries during the evacuation.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | | |

    Delta Amsterdam-Atlanta Makes Emergency Landing in Canada


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Eduard Brantjes

    What: Delta Airlines Boeing 767-300 en route from Amsterdam to Atlanta, Georgia
    Where: Gander Canada
    When: Dec 22nd 2009
    Who: not available
    Why: While en route, the flight developed a pressure problem, and diverted to Gander, NL with unstable cabin pressure. The flight made a successful landing, after passengers debarked normally, were eventually provided alternative transportation.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | | |

    Virgin America Flight Makes Emergency Landing at DFW Airport

    Virgin AmericaVirgin America flight VX-762 had to make an emergency landing at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Texas, on October 27th.

    The Airbus A319-100 plane was flying from to Dallas Love Field, Texas, to LaGuardia Airport, New York, when the crew decided to divert due to rudder issues.

    The plane landed safely. All 92 people aboard remained unharmed.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Frontier Airlines Flight Returns to Denver After Bird Strike

    Frontier Airlines flight F9-452 returned to Denver, Colorado, on September 10th.

    The Airbus A320-200 plane took off for Washington Dulles International Airport, Virginia, but had to turn back due to a bird strike.

    The plane landed safely. All passengers and crew members remained unharmed.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | | | |

    INDIA’s DGCA Asserts Co-Pilot Assertiveness

    George’s Point of View

    Following the Air India Express tragedy in Mangalore India (and definitely in response to it), the DGCA (India’s Directorate-General of Civil Aviation) has been trying to shut the gate after the horses are out. They’re still pointing their fingers at the pilot.

    The tape of the crash records the co-pilot Capt H S Ahluwalia (*i.e. the pnf) insisting to Commander Capt Zlatko Glusica to initiate a go-around. The Captain (**i.e. the pf) did not, and the plane landed too far down the runway, clipped an antenna, crashed thru the end of the runway, off the edge of the runway plateau. We can only assume the captain ignored his co-pilot, as no go-around was initiated.

    Apparently the pilot was in error and the co-pilot knew it. It must have been obvious to Ahluwalia that they were landing at the wrong angle too far down (the middle) of the runway–but he did not act on his knowledge. At any rate, he was in disagreement with his superior officer.

    Consequently, the DCGA has issued an operations circular highlighting procedural assertiveness for the co-pilot when he knows the pilot is wrong. The Mangalore tragedy is not mentioned by name, but it is certainly the silent subtext.

    Did the crash occur because the co-pilot did not take the controls? What exactly will this circular accomplish? Had this circular been public already, would the pilot and co-pilot have ended up in a wrestling match over controls of the airplane?

    It will be interesting to hear from pilots about what they think the consequences of this directive might be, and if they think a cultural context may play a part.

    I always turn to the experts. Right now, before the full investigation is out, I am hearing a lot of speculative “pilot error” but it is all speculation. But is it all pilot error?

    My experts remind me that “Every incident is linked to a chain of events. Each event alone is not sufficient reason to provoke an accident although when they link together the chances are multiplied and sometimes the accident occurs.” ( I am quoting a pilot.)

    For example, if pilot fatigue were a contributing factor (landing at dawn after a long tiring duty cycle), isn’t the carrier’s policy on pilot fatigue a contributory factor?

    The Boeing 737 landed midway on runway 24, and then overshot it, crashing into a gorge. Initial reports on the civil aviation website showed runway 27 mislabeled as runway 24. The actual crash site was not even pictured, a mistake that certainly casts doubt on the quality of the investigation, and possibly even the quality of the resources available to pilots at the time they were negotiating a landing. What did their map say? Is a pilot alone in error if the resources provided him are in error? I know I am digressing, but the point I want to make is this:

    I don’t have years of flight school, or engineering training but I do have opinion. And in my opinion, pilot error alone does not cause a crash like this.

    Terminology
    *pnf – pilot not flying
    **pf – pilot flying



    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer WT

    What: Air India Express Boeing 737-800 en route from Dubai to Mangalore
    Where: Mangalore airport
    When: 6:00 a.m May 22 2010
    Who: 160 (?) passengers including 23 children, 6 crew= 158 fatalities and 8 survivors
    Why: Air India Express flight 812 attempted touch down was around the middle marker. (Conflicting) reports are that it overshot the runway, and that the pilot intended a go round (tapes reveal the co pilot was urging a go-round) but the plane hit the localizer antenna at the runway’s end, plowed through the perimeter losing part of a wing, and went down 75 feet into a ravine, and broke into pieces and burst into flames. On touchdown, there was a reported “bang” which may have been a tire bursting. A drizzle started after the accident. From 5 to 10 people have been hospitalized, but according to reports there are possibly 3 survivors.

    Survivor Abdul Puttur suffered burns. He was seated near the wing exit and said that the pilot had announced the landing, then there was a thud. He saw huge flames after the plane fell into the ravine and then he jumped out from the back entrance. Another passenger said the pilot made no announcement.

    The Serbian pilot was Zlatko Glusica, first officer was S.S. Ahluwalia.

    According to DGCA rules, Mangalore International Airport is deemed a “critical airfield” which means that “supervised take offs and landings” are prohibited. Only the captain (not the first officer) can pilot take-offs and landings. Mangalore International Airport has a controversial table top runway and which forces pilots to make a precision landing. The airport has no buffer zone, and pilots landing planes must fly precisely or risk hurtling off the edge.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | |

    Malaysia Air Asia Runway Excursion, Plane Skids off Runway

    Selfie posted online, excursion in background
    Selfie posted online, excursion in background
    An Air Asia Airbus A320 en route from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to Brunei International Airport, Brunei suffered a runway excursion on landing.

    The airplane touched down and went off the side of the runway, and stopped in soft turf.

    Passengers disembarked via emergency slides directly on to the runway.

    The landing occurred under wet conditions.

    excursionslides

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.