| | | | |

Moscow: Transaero Boeing Hydraulic Issue

Similar Posts

  • |

    757 Emergency Landing in Syracuse

    What: United Airlines 757 en route from Boston to San Francisco.
    Where: Hancock Airport
    When: 10/16/08
    Who: 155 passengers
    Why:smoke detector in a bathroom went off. No injuries on landing.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | |

    United Airlines Jet Returns to SFO due to Medical Emergency

    United airlinesUnited Airlines flight 1188 had to turn back and make an emergency landing at San Francisco International Airport, California, on April 1.

    Authorities said the Boeing 757-300 aircraft was en-route to Boston, Massachusetts, when the pilots sought permission to return due to a sick flight attendant.

    The plane landed back uneventfully and the ill flight attendant was rushed to a nearby hospital.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | | |

    On taxi, wings of Nigerian Airforce C-130 and Arik Airlines Collide, No injury

    What: Nigerian Airforce C-130
    Where: Jos, Nigeria
    When: July 14, 2012
    Who: no injuries
    Why: The jet was about to take off when “An Arik Airline Boeing 737-700 with registration No 5NMJI on a routine flight to Lagos brushed the wing of a parked Nigerian Air Force C-130 (NAF 917) at the Yakubu Gowon Airport.”

    The tank 1 wing tip of the NAF C-130 was damaged. The wing of the Arik aircraft was dismembered.

    The announcement was made by Wing Commander A. Makun, Deputy Director, Directorate of Airforce information.

    The Air Force Jet was about to fly Airforce Military School and Airforce Girls Military School both in the Plateau State capital from Jos to Lagos. The flight was canceled.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Mangalore Crash Families Long for Closure


    Plane crash cases take a long time to settle, and the families of the Mangalore Crash can vouch for it, having been waiting since the date of the crash in May of 2010. Families who are still waiting on a settlement, and will be back in court this November. They aren’t looking for extraordinary measures, but want compensation for flight 812–the Air India Express Dubai-Mangalore in accordance with the Montreal Convention. 152 died in the crash.

    According to The National, Airlines are required to pay compensation of 7.5 million rupees (Dh560,000) per passenger to families of crash victims, just as a Kerala judge ordered. Then that judge was overruled in favor of Air India Express. This November, the case will move into the highest court to rule in favor of the victims or Air India Express.

    In George’s Point of View


    It’s not that simple.

    I know I have said this before, but it bears repeating.

    I must remind the families that the value of the aviation case is usually much higher than 75 lakhs.

    And this is because Tier II of the Montreal Treaty.

    The convention’s second tier deals with the portion of a claim exceeding the $155,000 limit. An airline can avoid liability for portions of claims over the limit by proving it was “not negligent or otherwise at fault.”

    I’m not a lawyer but I know from experience how it works. I have been working with wrongful death cases for years, and have learned a lot from the experience my aviation experts have graciously passed on to me.

    If you can prove provable damages, then Tier II (referred to in Article 21(2) of the Montreal Convention) Air India Express is liable to families/passengers for all personal injury or wrongful death damages exceeding 100,000 Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), unless the carrier(s) can prove that the injuries or deaths were not due to the negligence or other wrongful act or omission of the carrier or it servants or agents OR the injuries or deaths were solely due to the negligence or other wrongful act or omission of a third party.

    My guess is that the carrier will never prove this. The burden of proof is on them. If I am correct, and know the experts who have taught me, are correct, Air India Express is liable to the victims’ families for all damages under the applicable law, including but not limited to, pain & suffering of your loved one prior to death.

    They are liable for pain and suffering, the loss of support, i.e., money, the loss and enjoyment of life of the victim.

    I hope the families don’t sell themselves short, and give up all that may be coming in return for even a payment of the 75 lakhs. Accepting 75 lakhs—which may look like a lot after the losses they’ve suffered—but if they sign their name on the dotted like, they give up the right to future compensation.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | |

    Hainan Airlines Plane Returns to Boston due to Flaps Issue

    Hainan Airlines flight HU-7962 had to return and make an emergency landing in Boston, Massachusetts, on April 14th.

    The Boeing 787-900 plane took off for Shanghai, China, but had to turn back due to an issue with the flaps.

    The plane landed safely. All passengers and crew members remained unharmed.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | |

    Turkish Airlines Flight Makes Emergency Landing in Istanbul

    Turkish Airlines flight TK-623 had to return and make an emergency landing in Istanbul, Turkey, on May 15th.

    The Boeing 737-900 plane took off for Abuja, Nigeria, but had to return shortly afterwards after the crew failed to retract landing gear.

    The plane landed safely. All passengers and crew members remained unharmed.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.