|

Vegas.com Cyllenius Division First to Announce it has Implemented American Airlines Direct Connect

Similar Posts

  • |

    Simplified drug and alcohol management plans

    Small aviation organisations will be able to use a new simplified and streamlined process to comply with important drug and alcohol management requirements.
    The Civil Aviation Safety Authority is introducing the simplified drug and alcohol management processes for aviation organisations with seven or fewer employees engaged in safety sensitive activities.


    The new simplified processes do not apply to any aviation organisation engaged in or providing services to regular public transport operations.

    Aviation organisations eligible to use the new drug and alcohol compliance processes will use a standard drug and alcohol management plan provided by CASA. Full details of eligibility requirements are on CASA’s web site.

    Organisations will also use a CASA e-learning package to educate and train their employees in drug and alcohol responsibilities.

    CASA’s Director of Aviation Safety, John McCormick, said the new drug and alcohol compliance processes for small organisations recognised that the existing requirements could be unnecessarily onerous for these operations.

    “We are making life easier for small aviation organisations by streamlining the process of drug and alcohol management while maintaining high safety standards,” Mr McCormick said.

    “Small aviation organisations will no longer have to develop their own drug and alcohol management plans.”

    “By using CASA’s new drug and alcohol management plan and new on-line training small aviation organisations will save time and resources and still be confident they are meeting all the regulatory requirements.

    “CASA has listened to the concerns of the aviation industry about the impact of drug and alcohol management plans on small organisations and found a solution that is simpler and protects safety.”

    Small aviation organisations using the new processes will still be required to report to CASA every six months on their drug and alcohol management performance and CASA will continue to check on compliance.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | |

    American Airlines Flight Makes Emergency Landing in Charlotte

    American Airlines flight AA-730 had to return for an emergency landing in Charlotte, North Carolina, on June 21st.

    The Airbus A330-300 plane took off for Heathrow Airport, England, but had to return shortly afterwards due to a possible issue with the flaps.

    The plane landed back safely. All two hundred and fifty-eight passengers and sixteen crew members remained unharmed.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • |

    RITA Press Release: Long Tarmac Delays in July Down Dramatically from Last Year

    Monday, September 13, 2010 – The nation’s largest airlines reported only three flights in July with tarmac delays of more than three hours, compared to 161 flights in July 2009, with only a slight increase in the rate of canceled flights, according to the Air Travel Consumer Report released today by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).

    Data filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) showed the only tarmac delays longer than three hours reported in July by the 18 airlines that file on-time performance with DOT involved three American Eagle Airlines flights departing Chicago’s O’Hare airport on July 23, a day in which the Chicago area experienced a severe thunderstorm and a number of aircraft were caught on the runway. July was the third full month of data since the new aviation consumer rule went into effect on April 29. There were only four tarmac delays of more than three hours in May and June 2010 combined, compared to 302 during the same two-month period of 2009. BTS is a part of DOT’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA).

    The largest carriers canceled 1.4 percent of their scheduled domestic flights in July, slightly up from the 1.2 percent cancellation rate of July 2009. They posted a 1.5 percent cancellation rate in June 2010.

    The new tarmac delay rule prohibits U.S. airlines operating domestic flights from permitting an aircraft to remain on the tarmac for more than three hours without deplaning passengers, with exceptions allowed only for safety or security or if air traffic control advises the pilot in command that returning to the terminal would disrupt airport operations. The Department will investigate tarmac delays that exceed this limit.

    The monthly report also includes data on on-time performance, chronically delayed flights, flight cancellations and the causes of flight delays by the reporting carriers. In addition, it has information on airline bumping, reports of mishandled baggage filed with the carriers, and consumer service, disability and discrimination complaints received by DOT’s Aviation Consumer Protection Division. This report also includes reports of incidents involving pets traveling by air, as required to be filed by U.S. carriers.

    On-time Performance

    The reporting carriers recorded an overall on-time arrival rate of 76.7 percent in July, down from the 77.6 percent on-time rate of July 2009, but better than June 2010’s 76.4 percent.

    Tarmac Delays

    In July, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that .1030 percent of their scheduled flights had tarmac delays of two hours or more, up from .0840 percent in June. There were three flights with tarmac delays of more than three hours in July.

    Chronically Delayed Flights

    At the end of July, there were six flights that were chronically delayed – more than 30 minutes late more than 50 percent of the time – for three consecutive months. There were an additional 53 flights that were chronically delayed for two consecutive months. There were no chronically delayed flights for four consecutive months or more. A list of flights that were chronically delayed for a single month is available from BTS (www.bts.gov).

    Causes of Flight Delays

    In July, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that 6.21 percent of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared to 6.56 percent in June; 8.13 percent by late-arriving aircraft, compared to 8.12 percent in June; 6.37 percent by factors within the airline’s control, such as maintenance or crew problems, compared to 6.29 percent in June; 0.79 percent by extreme weather, compared to 0.74 percent in June; and 0.05 percent for security reasons, compared to 0.04 percent in June. Weather is a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by DOT’s Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category.

    Data collected by BTS also shows the percentage of late flights delayed by weather, including those reported in either the category of extreme weather or included in National Aviation System delays. In July, 37.61 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, down 4.59 percent from July 2009, when 39.42 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, and down 6.98 percent from June when 40.43 percent of late flights were delayed by weather.

    Detailed information on flight delays and their causes is available on the BTS site on the World Wide Web at http://www.bts.gov.

    Mishandled Baggage

    The U.S. carriers reporting flight delays and mishandled baggage data posted a mishandled baggage rate of 3.79 reports per 1,000 passengers in July, an improvement over July 2009’s rate of 4.06, but up from June 2010’s 3.72 rate.

    Incidents Involving Pets

    In July, carriers reported eight incidents involving the loss, death or injury of pets while traveling by air, up from the six incidents reported in both July 2009 and June 2010. July’s incidents involved five deaths, one injury, and two lost pets.

    Complaints About Airline Service

    In July, the Department received 1,094 complaints about airline service from consumers, up 32.3 percent from the 827 complaints filed in July 2009, but down 22.9 percent from the 1,419 complaints received in June 2010.

    Complaints About Treatment of Disabled Passengers

    The report also contains a tabulation of complaints filed with DOT in July against airlines regarding the treatment of passengers with disabilities. The Department received a total of 56 disability-related complaints in July, higher than the total of 54 complaints filed in July 2009, but lower than the 60 received in June 2010.

    Complaints About Discrimination

    In July, the Department received 12 complaints alleging discrimination by airlines due to factors other than disability – such as race, religion, national origin or sex – down from both the total of 17 recorded in July 2009 and 22 received in June 2010.

    Consumers may file their complaints in writing with the Aviation Consumer Protection Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-75, W96-432, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; by voice mail at (202) 366-2220 or by TTY at (202) 366-0511; or on the web at http://airconsumer.dot.gov.

    Consumers who want on-time performance data for specific flights should call their airline’s reservation number or their travel agent. This information is available on the computerized reservation systems used by these agents.

    The Air Travel Consumer Report can be found on DOT’s World Wide Web site at http://airconsumer.dot.gov. It is available in “pdf” and Microsoft Word format.

    Air Travel Consumer Report July 2010
    Key On-Time Performance and Flight Cancellation Statistics

    Based on Data Filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics by the 18 Reporting Carriers

    Overall

    76.7 percent on-time arrivals

    Highest On-Time Arrival Rates

    1. Hawaiian Airlines – 94.7 percent

    2. Alaska Airlines – 88.7 percent

    3. United Airlines – 83.0 percent

    Lowest On-Time Arrival Rates

    1. ExpressJet Airlines – 68.6 percent

    2. Comair – 69.1 percent

    3. Delta Air Lines – 69.9 percent

    Flights with Longest Tarmac Delays

    1. American Eagle flight 4120 from Chicago O’Hare to Knoxville, TN, 7/23/10 – delayed on tarmac 214 minutes

    2. American Eagle flight 4241 from Chicago O’Hare to Raleigh/Durham, NC, 7/23/10 – delayed on tarmac 199 minutes

    3. American Eagle flight 4196 from Chicago O’Hare to Baltimore/Washington International Airport – delayed on tarmac 198 minutes

    (There were only three flights with tarmac delays of more than three hours in July)

    Highest Rates of Canceled Flights

    1. Comair – 3.7 percent

    2. Pinnacle Airlines – 2.9 percent

    3. Delta Air lines – 2.7 percent

    Lowest Rates of Canceled Flights

    1. Hawaiian Airlines – 0.0 percent*

    2. Continental Airlines – 0.2 percent

    3. Alaska Airlines – 0.4 percent

    *Hawaiian canceled two flights in July

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | |

    American Airlines Flight Makes Emergency Landing at Raleigh–Durham International Airport

    American Airlines flight AA-5562 made an emergency landing at Raleigh–Durham International Airport, North Carolina, on January 4th.

    The plane heading from Birmingham, Alabama, to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, Virginia, was diverted due to a fuel balance issue.

    The plane landed safely. All passengers and crew members remained unharmed.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | |

    AA Flight 242 Makes Emergency Landing at Logan

    American AirlinesThe American Airlines Flight 242 from Chicago to Dusseldorf, Germany made an emergency landing at Logan International Airport in Boston on May 25.

    According to the airline, the emergency landing was caused by a male passenger’s sudden illness. He was taken off the flight at Logan and transported to a hospital.

    The plane later resumed its journey to Dusseldorf after dropping off the sick passenger.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • |

    Boeing Conducts Test Flight

    ST. LOUIS, May 26, 2010 — The Boeing Company [NYSE: BA] successfully flew its ScanEagle Compressed Carriage (SECC) unmanned airborne system (UAS) at a testing facility in eastern Oregon on May 12. The 75-minute flight evaluated the aircraft’s airworthiness and flight characteristics in a simulated intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) mission.

    The SECC — powered by a six-horsepower, heavy-fuel engine — was launched from a ground vehicle, flew an autonomous flight plan at various altitudes and provided streaming video from its electro-optical/infrared sensor package to a nearby ground station. The SECC was recovered using the same runway-independent SkyHook recovery system used by the ScanEagle and Integrator unmanned airborne systems. The SECC system will complete additional tests in the coming months.

    “This is a big step toward adding another aircraft with additional capabilities to Boeing’s UAS stable,” said Ron Perkins, director of Boeing Phantom Works’ Advanced Unmanned Airborne Systems. “The vehicle’s 132-inch wingspan and folding aero surfaces allow it to be carried on an aircraft pylon or in a container, giving the warfighter the choice of operating it from air, underwater, ground or surface platforms.”

    The SECC is a long-endurance, autonomous UAS designed to provide ISR, targeting, and battle-damage assessment.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.