In Jamaica, Half a Runway is Better Than None, Mon…

Similar Posts

  • |

    Never Forget

    Lives have been shattered by the events I record.

    I know you could drive a mid-seventies Cadillac Fleetwood through the gaps in these records, but that is partly because I generally write about an event only once, partly because my content is based on a couple of randomly gathered secondhand observations, partly because I do not follow up, and partly because I am not an expert. (I never claim to be an expert in anything but my own life experience.) How could I be? The actual investigations take years, and are based on combined expert opinions of a whole boatload of bona fide experts. I am only a bystander, a bystander of second-hand bystanders, in fact. The reporters who inform me frequently misstate, interpret or misinterpret the facts, or add little imaginary flourishes. I still do my best to get the facts out as accurately as I can.

    Official final reports are the result of the combined knowledge and experience of experts (some of whom have agendas and bias) in “air traffic control, operations, meteorology, human performance, structures, systems, powerplants, maintenance records, survival factors, aircraft performance, cockpit voice recorder, flight data recorder, and material factors,” interviewers, rescue observers and specialists as needed. Sometimes the reports are obfuscated by agenda, bias or politics.

    I am just another pair of eyes, and untrained eyes, at that.

    I never, or hardly ever, write about what happens in the seats. Ironically, this is what I write now as I sit in one of those seats myself. Picture me in the cabin of a flight to Argentina. A young family is also on this flight, with hyperactive children running up and down the aisle whenever possible. Picture an infant or two, their safety seats empty as their mothers rock them to still their tears, to the relief of the couple across the aisle, and the irritation of one of the flight attendants. Picture a couple of newlyweds off on their honeymoon, and another couple of newlyweds returning from their honeymoon. Students flying home for the holidays, others returning after. Vacationers in Hawaiianwear. Nearer to me, an assortment of business people in summer suits appropriate for Argentina in July. This accidental ensemble of humankind is engaged in various activities: thumbing through magazines, cloud gazing through the windows, watching movies, listening to music, reading, studying paperwork, connecting intimately in intense whispers (or avoiding) a seatmate, sleeping.

    Just as all around me are engaged in making it through the flight, in a moment precisely like this one, other lives were interrupted. Maybe it was an instant, maybe a four minute fall. Maybe there was no time to process what was happening, or enough time to feel horrible bone-deep terror, and to endure for long moments the fight-flight reflex while belted into a seat. The detail of each event through individual eyes is simultaneously unique and identical.

    I don’t write about these moments. It is too horrible to contemplate except in cases like when Chesley Burnett Sullenberger is making a miracle happen.

    Out of the generous experiences of the decades of a whole, full life, families want to remember their loved ones in their entirety. They don’t want or need to be haunted by the torment of that single moment of horror, a final dark exclamation point.

    So when I write about these terrible crashes, I talk about system failures, or spatial disorientation, ATC schedules, fumes, pressurization, sleepy pilots, malfunctioning radar, stick shakers or a couple hundred other possible causes I have seen frequently enough for them to become familiar even to a layman like me.
    But it is not about the machine. It is about those who boarded that flight in perfect trust, expecting to disembark and fill more decades with passion and life. It is always and only about the passenger.

    I don’t mention them.

    But not an article is written, not a character is typed that I forget that the only matter is the passenger and the family.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • Does the Cutting Edge Cut too Far?

    Bombardier is promising their new C series planes will “cut greenhouse gas emissions, ensure substantial fuel savings and be four times quieter .

    Let’s hope all these cuts don’t also sacrifice safety along with heavier materials. As far as safety is concerned, will the new planes made of “lightweight composite and aluminum lithium materials, built to accommodate stricter environmental standards and” well-built airplane(s) … capable of withstanding turbulence” be sacrificing the safety of sturdier construction and time-tested safety features to reach optimistically green standards?

    How will these new lighter planes fare when subjected to unexpected turbulence, which is commonplace in realistic day to day flying conditions? I have no answers, only questions.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Protestations of Bias in Official BEA Report

    In George’s Point of View


    Like the pilot association, we wonder how blaming the victims will improve the state of aviation.

    The pilots of Air France Flight 447 had already lost valid data before the Airbus A330 stalled. Fell for three minutes down into the Atlantic in June of 2009, carrying the 228 people aboard to their death. Fell, with pilots flying blind. Fell, with only erroneous data available. Fell with the warning system squawking confused messages. Yet the Bea report says this was was the pilot’s fault.

    We want to know if this investigation will turn out to be deliberate persecution of the pilots instead of legitimate prosecution of Airbus flawed design?

    It is no wonder that the families of the victims are crying foul that the report criticizes pilot performance but not the faulty stall alarms.
    It is no wonder that pilot associations all over the world are protesting.
    It is no wonder that the BEA is being accused of protecting Airbus.

    Why would the recommendation to improve the warning system be removed from the report?
    Why, if not to protect Airbus, scheming to avoid the legal and financial consequences of the crash?

    Pilots say that the stall alarm tends to sound while simultaneously messaging the pilots to ignore the “superfluous” warning. Airbus denies this ever happens.

    How valid can the report be if it is being skewed to protect Airbus and blame the pilots? Should the BEA be placed under criminal investigation alongside with Air France and Airbus?

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • Advice from Good “Friends”

    So I’m drinking my coffee this morning in London, and look what Bloomberg’s headline says that Airbus Chief Operating Officer John Leahy said…

    Boeing 747-8 Needs Passenger Evacuation Tests, Airbus Says
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-16/boeing-747-8-should-run-passenger-evacuation-tests-airbus-says.html

    So it is news that Boeing should do more tests on the basis of a rival’s comment that “I intend to fly in that airplane one of these days and I’d like to know you can get out of it.” Well. I guess it is news. Who knew. If I were Airbus Chief Operating Officer John Leahy, I wouldn’t want to fly Airbus either, but I don’t know that I’d tell a newspaper reporter that.

    Certainly Airbus Chief Operating Officer John Leahy’s advice in the article is kindly meant. Surely Airbus Chief Operating Officer John Leahy would not be wishing problems on a rival company, especially looking back on Airbus’s own evacuation problems: “They evacuated 873 people from its A380 in 80 seconds, 10 seconds faster than its goal. One person broke a leg in the exercise, which was carried out in a dark hangar at an Airbus factory in Hamburg.”

    Let’s get real.

    As if Airbus doesn’t have a vested interest in causing Boeing further delay.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • Hospitalization, Not Criminalization

    By now everyone has heard of Jet Blue Captain Clayton Osbon. It appears he has already been tried and convicted in the media. When I look at the facts—or at least what we know of the facts—of his situation, and his history, I can not help but wonder what else is going on.

    Since his breakdown in the cockpit, he has been held at The Pavilion at Northwest Texas Hospital in Amarillo. A psychiatric hospital is a good place for him to be.

    This is a man who has spent many years in the cockpit, with nothing but an exemplary record. This is a man who is well known by neighbors and friends as a man of good character. This is a man whose friends say on camera, “that was not Clayton” as they refer to his unhinged behavior. He was behaving out of character. His wife said “It is our belief, as Clayton’s family, that while he was clearly distressed, he was not intentionally violent toward anyone…There are several different sides to every story. Just keep that in mind.”

    Today he was taken from Northwest Texas Hospital to court by the FBI. In a seven minute hearing, he was advised of his rights, and the government filed a motion for pre-trial detention. The judge agreed to hold Osbon in the Randall County Jail in Amarillo without bond.

    His situation reminds me of several other incidents I’ve seen lately, where aviation personnel have had meltdowns during flights. Take a second and look at this: An American Airlines flight from Dallas–when this flight attendant on Flight 2232 had a meltdown. Eerily similar, isn’t it? Is it a coincidence?
    Both of these incidents happened in Texas.

    All I am saying is this. A man does not change overnight. Don’t get me wrong–I don’t think he should be in a cockpit. But whether he had a breakdown, is depressed, was sleepwalking, developing some kind of exhaustion psychosis, affected by a drug or combination of drugs or other factors, Jet Blue Captain Clayton Osbon has spent decades as a man of good character and reputation. He would not just throw it away. He should be in a medical facility with doctors, not in a jail behind bars.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | | | | |

    Boeing 787 Smokes Battery in Boston


    On January 7, 2013, a Japan Airlines Boeing 787 Dreamliner Japan-Boston had already landed in Boston, and all 184 passengers had safely disembarked when smoke filled the cabin.

    A fire was found in a battery aboard the plane. Boston Firefighters arrived at 10:40 a.m. and put out the fire.

    Passengers were provided alternative transportation and overnight accommodations.

    Electrical issues in the avionics bay where the battery is located are a known issue in this type of plane, which uses electrical motors instead of hydraulics in certain areas. The auxiliary battery in the compartment kicks in after the engine kicks off. That’s what happened on test flights, and from what I have heard, that is what happened here.

    In George’s Point of View

    Let’s slow down with this great plane. Let’s get the kinks out of it before we put humans on too many of these Dreamliners. Let them stay Dreamliner and not become Nightmareliners. United is starting service but are these planes really ready? There have been engine problems and some spooky events. We don’t read too much about them, but I know they have occurred. I love this plane, I want to fly all over the world in it, and if I live long enough, I will, but, is it ready?

    According to the NTSB report below, the NTSB seems to agree with me that incidents like this warrant investigation.

    Press Release
    WASHINGTON– Investigators with the National Transportation Safety Board are gathering information regarding reports of smoke aboard a Boeing 787 at Boston’s Logan Airport today.

    The Japan Airlines 787 was on the ground and empty of passengers at the time of the incident.

    The NTSB has dispatched an investigator to Boston. Based on a review of the factual information gathered, the NTSB will determine the extent of its investigation.
    Video Below

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.