| | | | |

Sikorsky Down off Norfolk, Va Beach

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Teenager Sues Masturbation Airlines


    Seventeen year old Monica Amestoy was flying home from a debate in New York—a six hour flight—and witnessed an unwanted exhibition: a man across the aisle was masturbating. She pointed out the incident to Flight attendants.

    After nothing was done to stop the man, seventeen year old Monica Amestoy returned home to California to file a lawsuit against United Airlines.

    The incident happened last year.

    Although Monica complained to a flight attendant, United failed to safeguard Monica. Subsequently, United took no action and are surely guilty of neglecting the welfare of their passengers.

    On landing in Los Angeles, UA failed to immediately report the criminal activity. Monica reported the incident to her father and he contacted law enforcement. After the investigation, the FBI prosecuted and convicted the perpetrator.

    Gloria Allred filed the suit in Los Angeles county superior court.

    Video

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | |

    Landing Practice Turned Upside Down at Maine Airport

    On Jan 15, 2013, Robert Lewandowski, the pilot of a Morgan Aviation Aeronca 7A was training at Central Maine Airport—practicing landings— but on his eighth landing, it appeared that the plane’s rear wheel developed a problem.

    The plane veered off-runway, hopped snowbanks, struck a snow bank and flipped. The rented plane’s propeller and right wing strut sustained damage. The FAA is investigating.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | | |

    Qantas Smoking Flight Display Shortens Flight


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Mark H

    What: Qantas Boeing 747-400 en route from Sydney Australia to Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Where: Sydney
    When: Nov 15th 2010
    Who: 199 passengers, 21 crew
    Why: While en route, the plane developed smoke in the cockpit, according to Qantas, originating in the cockpit electronic display. The crew donned oxygen masks, and decided to return to Sydney. They dumped fuel, and landed safely–described by a passenger as a perfect landing.

    The video interview of a passenger has his account of when the event, including when entertainment systems switched off, the second officer came through the cabin with an explanation; the captain explained later too, once they were on the ground. The passenger also makes a significant point about how the crew must be feeling about Qantas maintenance, and that possibly too many Qantas maintenance resources are being diverted to the A380 problem.

    Passengers were scheduled on a flight with a 6 hour delay.

    The interviewer says “The Qantas A380s are now being called 180s. They take off, go for ten minutes, make a 180 and go back where they started from.”

    Rolls-Royce announced it will replace the A380 superjumbo engines with oil leaks in Qantas’s fleet.

    Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/11/16/qantas-plane-makes-emergency-landing-after-cockpit-fills-with-smoke-115875-22720244/#ixzz15TQgHSrI
    Go Camping for 95p! Vouchers collectable in the Daily and Sunday Mirror until 11th August . Click here for more information


    Click video to isten to passenger’s account

    Qantas Statement on QF17

    Sydney, 15 November 2010
    Qantas Flight 17 from Sydney to Buenos Aires today, operated by a Boeing 747, returned to Sydney after experiencing an issue with the aircraft’s electrical system.
    The aircraft departed at 11:11am and landed safely back at Sydney Airport at 1:22pm. Priority clearance to land was gained from air traffic control, following procedure. There were 199 passengers, three flight crew and 18 cabin crew on board.

    Engineers are inspecting the aircraft to determine the cause of the issue. Passengers have disembarked into the terminal building.

    Reports that the aircraft lost pressure in the main cabin are incorrect. Oxygen supply to the cabin was unaffected.

    The incident has been reported to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority and the Air Transport Safety Bureau.

    The flight crew operating the service acted appropriately in line with their training and with Qantas’ safety-first approach. Qantas regrets the inconvenience to passengers and will seek to make contingency arrangements for those affected.

    Further details will be released as they become available.

    Issued by Qantas Corporate Communication

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | |

    Korean Air Crash at Nimitz Hill, Guam


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Michel Gilliand

    What: Korean Air Boeing 747-3B5B (747-300) en route from Seoul, Korea to Agana, Guam.
    Where: Nimitz Hill, Guam
    When: August 6, 1997
    Who: 2 pilots, 1 flight engineer, 14 flight attendants, and 237 passengers
    Why: On August 6, 1997, about 0142:26 Guam local time, Korean Air flight 801, a Boeing 747-3B5B (747-300), crashed at Nimitz Hill, Guam. Flight 801 departed from Kimpo International Airport, Seoul, Korea, with 2 pilots, 1 flight engineer, 14 flight attendants, and 237 passengers on board. The airplane had been cleared to land on runway 6 Left at A.B. Won Guam International Airport, Agana, Guam, and crashed into high terrain about 3 miles SW of the airport. 228 were killed, and 23 passengers and 3 flight attendants survived the accident with serious injuries. The airplane was destroyed by impact forces and post crash fire. Flight 801 was operating in U.S. airspace as a regularly scheduled international passenger service flight. The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause to be the captain’s failure to adequately brief and execute the nonprecision approach and the first officer’s and flight engineer’s failure to effectively monitor and cross-check the captain’s execution of the approach. Contributing to these failures were the captain’s fatigue and Korean Air’s inadequate flight crew training.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Anger Mounts

    Cezar Britto, president of The Order of Lawyers of Brazil said it was “a tragedy waiting to happen,” echoing public opinion. “What exploded in Cagonhas was not just the TAM airbus and almost 200 victims but the credibility of the Brazilian aviation system.”

    Cagonhas is notorious for its short, dangerous runway.

    “The runway was as slippery as soap,” a pilot confessed.

    Rescuers pulled 181 bodies from the twisted metal wreckage and rubble. Five people are listed as missing. 11 are hospitalized. No passengers survived.

    Relatives gathered to identify the remains amid calls for authorities to improve airport safety.

    The crash is the latest of a series of airline disasters. The main runway had been resurfaced last month, but more work was scheduled to allow for better water drainage.

    “Control tower operators had warned the runway should be closed,” said Sergio Olivera, who heads the Federation of Air Controllers.

    Footage of landing showed the aircraft travelling at high speed–the Airbus took only three seconds as opposed to the usual 11 to traverse the runway then disappeared after skidding off the left side of the runway. Then a ball of flame filled the sky.

    An investigation has been ordered. One of the black boxes has been recovered.

    President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva declared three days of national mourning. Pope Benedict XVI expressed his sorrow.

    In February a judge banned Fokker 100, Boeing 737-800 and Boeing 737/700 jetliners from the airport but the ruling was overturned in appeals.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • |

    No Pilot shortage? How Confusing


    As this video so stridently complains “Air India is Claiming a pilot shortage.”
    But what is wrong with this picture: cancelling flights, pilots flying below their minimum hours; after flights cancelled, then routes immediately taken over by smaller airlines. Why would Air India give away profits to smaller, private airlines? Is cash greasing someone’s pockets? Is this poor management, or something else?

    What?

    So. How is it that the pilots in the Mangalore crash were overflown (and exhausted) , when this report is saying Air India flights are normally underflown? Is this just a change of policy to attempt to change history? A one time incident due to cancellations? What is going on here? Why isn’t India’s aviation’s agency at least as upset as this reporter?

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.