• |

    Stillwater Crash Pilot Identified


    Pictured: Cessna 337C Super Skymaster flying in Malta. The plane in the crash was in Oklahoma, and painted blue, according to photos at the scene of the crash.
    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Malcolm J.Bezzina
    What: CESSNA 337C registered to George Waller en route from a private airstrip to Stillwater for fuel.
    Where: STILLWATER, OK
    When: 03/27/2009
    Who: George Waller, fatality at the scene
    Why: The plane made a series of turns and was westbound when it crashed in a grove of trees on a private residence near 92nd Avenue and Washington Road eight miles from Stillwater. Witnesses said the “plane didn’t sound right.”

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Update: Japan Air Commuter Lands on One Engine


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer James Scott
    What: Japan Air Commuter de Havilland Dash 8-400 en route from Tanegashima to Kagoshima
    Where: Kagoshima
    When: Mar 25th 2009 10:26 a.m
    Who: 42 passengers
    Why: When the left hand engine’s oil pressure dropped, the pilot shut down the engine and continued on to Kagoshima. Maintenance crews discovered significant damage in the engine. There were no injuries reported.

    This was also reported as a Bombardier Inc. DHC-8-Q400. The Bombardier Dash 8 was formerly known as the de Havilland Canada Dash 8; Bombardier acquired de Havilland Canada (DHC) .

    Due to the engine damage found by maintenance crews, two investigators rated this as a serious incident. The gearbox of the engine had failed and several turbine blades were found to be damaged

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | |

    Arrow Cargo Crumbles in Flight over Brazil


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Carlos A. Morillo Doria
    What: Arrow Cargo McDonnell Douglas DC-10 freighter, en route from Manaus, AM Brazil to Bogota Colombia
    Where: Manaus (rua Humaita, Terra Nova)
    When: Mar 26th 2009
    Who: 4 crew flew the plane that damaged 12 houses
    Why: The crew heard an explosion but kept going, unaware the engine had disgorged parts of the engine nacelle, its combustion chamber, turbine and outlet. The company has already said they’ll reimburse locals for the damage.

    No doubt.

    They continued on to Bogata…or they would have if weather hadn’t diverted them to Medellin.


    View Larger Map

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | | |

    Emergency: AeroLineas Argentinas Smoke in Cabin


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Baires Aviation Photography
    What: Aerolineas Argentinas McDonnell Douglas MD-88 en route from Buenos Aires to Trelew, Argentina
    Where: Trelew
    When: Mar 25th 2009
    Who: 41 passengers
    Why: On approach to Trelew, an electrical problem caused the cabin to fill with smoke. After the safe landing, passengers debarked via slides. One flight attendant was treated for smoke inhalation.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • DOT: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-300, A340-200, A340-300

    [Federal Register: March 26, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 57)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Page 13148-13152]
    From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
    [DOCID:fr26mr09-30]

    ———————————————————————–

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

    Federal Aviation Administration

    14 CFR Part 39

    [Docket No. FAA-2009-0264; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-174-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64

    Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-300, A340-200, and
    A340-300 Series Airplanes

    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

    ———————————————————————–

    SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
    products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
    continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)

    [[Page 13149]]

    originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and
    correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes
    the unsafe condition as:

    One Long Range operator experienced a failure of one spoiler
    servo-control, associated with surface deflection in flight and
    hydraulic leak. On ground, this servo-control Part Number (P/N)
    MZ4306000-02X was found with the maintenance cover broken.
    Investigations showed that the rupture of the maintenance cover was
    due to pressure pulse fatigue.
    * * * The rupture of the maintenance cover in flight may result
    in the deflection of the associated spoiler surface up to the null-
    hinge position (loss of the hydraulic locking). It may also result
    in the loss of the associated hydraulic system (external leakage).
    In the worst case, the three hydraulic systems may be affected,
    which constitutes an unsafe condition.

    * * * * *
    Loss of the three hydraulic systems could result in reduced
    controllability of the airplane. The proposed AD would require actions
    that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the
    MCAI.

    DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 27, 2009.

    ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
    www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Fax: (202) 493-2251.
    Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
    Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
    Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
    Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
    Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
    Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
    through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
    Airbus SAS–Airworthiness Office–EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
    31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
    93 45 80, e-mail airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; Internet http://
    www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
    information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
    this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.

    Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
    www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
    between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
    holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
    evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
    address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
    in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
    shortly after receipt.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
    International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
    227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149.

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
    arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
    listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include “Docket No. FAA-2009-0264;
    Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-174-AD” at the beginning of your
    comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
    will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
    this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
    www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
    will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
    receive about this proposed AD.

    Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
    Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
    Airworthiness Directive 2008-0160, dated August 22, 2008 (referred to
    after this as “the MCAI”), to correct an unsafe condition for the
    specified products. The MCAI states:

    One Long Range operator experienced a failure of one spoiler
    servo-control, associated with surface deflection in flight and
    hydraulic leak. On ground, this servo-control Part Number (P/N)
    MZ4306000-02X was found with the maintenance cover broken.
    Investigations showed that the rupture of the maintenance cover was
    due to pressure pulse fatigue.
    The maintenance cover allows switching the servo-control from
    “Operational” to “Maintenance” modes. The same cover is
    installed on all standard MZ spoiler servo-controls except on P/N
    MZ4339390-12 and MZ4306000-12, which have a reinforced maintenance
    cover. The rupture of the maintenance cover in flight may result in
    the deflection of the associated spoiler surface up to the null-
    hinge position (loss of the hydraulic locking). It may also result
    in the loss of the associated hydraulic system (external leakage).
    In the worst case, the three hydraulic systems may be affected,
    which constitutes an unsafe condition.
    For the reasons described above, this EASA AD requires the
    identification and the modification of all standard MZ spoiler
    servo-controls with initial maintenance cover (P/N MZ4339390-01X, –
    02X, -10X for position 1 and P/N MZ4306000-01X, 02X, -10X for
    positions 2 to 6) into standard MZ servo-controls with reinforced
    maintenance cover (P/N MZ4339390-12 for position 1 and P/N
    MZ4306000-12 for positions 2 to 6).

    Loss of the three hydraulic systems could result in reduced
    controllability of the airplane. You may obtain further information by
    examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

    Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued the service information described in the
    following table. The actions described in this service information are
    intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

    Service Information
    ————————————————————————
    Service Bulletin Revision level Date
    ————————————————————————
    Airbus Mandatory Service 01……………. July 25, 2008.
    Bulletin A330-27A3154.
    Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27- 02……………. March 2, 2007.
    3110.
    Airbus Mandatory Service 01……………. July 25, 2008.
    Bulletin A340-27A4154.
    Airbus Service Bulletin A340-27- 01……………. March 2, 2007.
    4115.
    ————————————————————————

    [[Page 13150]]

    FAA’s Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
    country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
    to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
    been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
    information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
    evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
    exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
    type design.

    Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
    general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
    necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
    AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
    changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
    provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
    in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
    highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

    Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
    would affect 16 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
    would take between 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
    requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
    work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
    AD on U.S. operators to be $1,280, or $80 per product.

    Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to
    issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
    authority of the FAA Administrator. “Subtitle VII: Aviation
    Programs,” describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s
    authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
    “Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
    requirements.” Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
    promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
    regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
    finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
    the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
    that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
    rulemaking action.

    Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
    implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
    have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
    between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
    of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
    regulation:
    1. Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order
    12866;
    2. Is not a “significant rule” under the DOT Regulatory Policies
    and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
    negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
    of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
    comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
    reference, Safety.

    The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
    Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

    PART 39–AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

    Sec. 39.13 [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:

    Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2009-0264; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-
    174-AD.

    Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by April 27, 2009.

    Affected ADs

    (b) None.

    Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-300, A340-200, and
    A340-300 series airplanes; certificated in any category, except
    those identified in paragraph (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Airbus Model A330-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, –
    342, and -343 airplanes, manufacturer serial numbers (MSNs) up to
    and including MSN 588, except those on which Airbus Service Bulletin
    A330-27-3110 has been embodied in service.
    (2) Airbus Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, and -313
    airplanes, MSNs up to and including MSN 598, except those on which
    Airbus Service Bulletin A340-27-4115 has been embodied in service.

    Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
    controls.

    Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
    states:
    One Long Range operator experienced a failure of one spoiler
    servo-control, associated with surface deflection in flight and
    hydraulic leak. On ground, this servo-control Part Number (P/N)
    MZ4306000-02X was found with the maintenance cover broken.
    Investigations showed that the rupture of the maintenance cover was
    due to pressure pulse fatigue.
    The maintenance cover allows switching the servo-control from
    “Operational” to “Maintenance” modes. The same cover is
    installed on all standard MZ spoiler servo-controls except on P/N
    MZ4339390-12 and MZ4306000-12, which have a reinforced maintenance
    cover. The rupture of the maintenance cover in flight may result in
    the deflection of the associated spoiler surface up to the null-
    hinge position (loss of the hydraulic locking). It may also result
    in the loss of the associated hydraulic system (external leakage).
    In the worst case, the three hydraulic systems may be affected,
    which constitutes an unsafe condition.
    For the reasons described above, this EASA AD requires the
    identification and the modification of all standard MZ spoiler
    servo-controls with initial maintenance cover (P/N MZ4339390-01X, –
    02X, -10X for position 1 and P/N MZ4306000-01X, 02X, -10X for
    positions 2 to 6) into standard MZ servo-controls with reinforced
    maintenance cover (P/N MZ4339390-12 for position 1 and P/N
    MZ4306000-12 for positions 2 to 6).
    Loss of the three hydraulic systems could result in reduced
    controllability of the airplane.

    Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) For airplanes that have accumulated more than 8,500 total
    flight cycles since first flight as of the effective date of this
    AD: Do the actions required by paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii)
    of this AD, as applicable.
    (i) Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD:
    Identify the part number of spoiler servo-controls installed on the
    airplane at all positions in order to determine the number of
    affected hydraulic circuits in accordance with the Accomplishment
    Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-27A3154,
    Revision 01; or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-27A4154,
    Revision 01; both dated July 25, 2008, as applicable. If there is no
    spoiler servo-control installed with a part number

    [[Page 13151]]

    identified in Table 1 of this AD, no further action is required by
    this paragraph.
    (ii) If there is any spoiler servo-control installed with a part
    number identified in Table 1 of this AD, do all applicable actions
    required by paragraph (f)(2), (f)(3), or (f)(4) of this AD.

    Table 1–Spoiler Servo-Control Part Numbers
    ————————————————————————
    Position 1 Positions 2 through 6
    ————————————————————————
    MZ4339390-01X……………………….. MZ4306000-01X.
    MZ4339390-02X……………………….. MZ4306000-02X.
    MZ4339390-10X……………………….. MZ4306000-10X.
    ————————————————————————

    (2) If three affected hydraulic circuits are identified during
    the inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, do the
    actions required by paragraphs (f)(2)(i), (f)(2)(ii), and
    (f)(2)(iii) of this AD, at the time specified.
    (i) Before the accumulation of 10,400 total flight cycles since
    first flight, or within 3 months after accomplishing the
    requirements of paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD, whichever occurs
    later: Modify the affected spoiler servo-controls on one hydraulic
    circuit in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
    Service Bulletin A330-27-3110, Revision 02; or Airbus Service
    Bulletin A340-27-4115, Revision 01; both dated March 2, 2007, as
    applicable.
    (ii) Before the accumulation of 10,800 total flight cycles since
    first flight, or within 6 months after accomplishing the
    requirements in paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD, whichever occurs
    later: Modify the affected spoiler servo-controls on the second
    hydraulic circuit in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
    of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27-3110, Revision 02; or Airbus
    Service Bulletin A340-27-4115, Revision 01; both dated March 2,
    2007, as applicable.
    (iii) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD:
    Modify the remaining affected spoiler servo-controls in accordance
    with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin
    A330-27-3110, Revision 02; or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-27-4115,
    Revision 01; both dated March 2, 2007, as applicable.
    (3) If two affected hydraulic circuits are identified during the
    inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, do the actions
    required by paragraphs (f)(3)(i) and (f)(3)(ii) of this AD, at the
    time specified:
    (i) Before the accumulation of 10,800 total flight cycles since
    first flight, or within 6 months after accomplishing the
    requirements in paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD, whichever occurs
    later: Modify the affected spoiler servo-controls on one hydraulic
    circuit in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
    Service Bulletin A330-27-3110, Revision 02; or Airbus Service
    Bulletin A340-27-4115, Revision 01; both dated March 2, 2007, as
    applicable.
    (ii) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD:
    Modify the remaining affected spoiler servo-controls in accordance
    with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin
    A330-27-3110, Revision 02; or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-27-4115,
    Revision 01; both dated March 2, 2007, as applicable.
    (4) If one affected hydraulic circuit is identified during the
    inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD: Within 18 months
    after the effective date of this AD, modify the affected spoiler
    servo-controls in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
    Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27-3110, Revision 02; or Airbus Service
    Bulletin A340-27-4115, Revision 01; both dated March 2, 2007, as
    applicable.
    (5) For airplanes that have accumulated less than or equal to
    8,500 total flight cycles since first flight as of the effective
    date of this AD: Do the actions required by paragraphs (f)(5)(i) and
    (f)(5)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.
    (i) Within 9 months after the effective date of this AD: Do the
    actions specified in paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD. If there is no
    spoiler servo-control installed with a part number identified in
    Table 1 of this AD, no further action is required by this paragraph.
    (ii) If there is any spoiler servo-control installed with a part
    number identified in Table 1 of this AD: Within 18 months after the
    effective date of this AD, modify all the affected spoiler servo-
    controls in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
    Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27-3110, Revision 02; or Airbus Service
    Bulletin A340-27-4115, Revision 01; both dated March 2, 2007, as
    applicable.
    (6) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install
    any spoiler servo-control with a part number identified in Table 1
    of this AD on any aircraft as a replacement part, unless the part
    has been modified in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
    of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27-3110, Revision 02; or Airbus
    Service Bulletin A340-27-4115, Revision 01; both dated March 2,
    2007, as applicable.
    (7) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in
    accordance with the service bulletins specified in Table 2 of this
    AD are considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding
    requirements of this AD.

    Table 2–Credit Service Information
    ————————————————————————
    Service Bulletin Revision level Date
    ————————————————————————
    Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27- Original………. November 28, 2003.
    3110.
    Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27- 01……………. March 26, 2004.
    3110.
    Airbus Service Bulletin A340-27- Original………. November 28, 2003.
    4115.
    ————————————————————————

    FAA AD Differences

    Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
    as follows: No differences.

    Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
    International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
    has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
    the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
    Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
    Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
    Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149.
    Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
    applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
    principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
    principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
    corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
    actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
    FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
    (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
    is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
    this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
    collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
    0056.

    Related Information

    (h) Refer to European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
    Directive 2008-0160, dated August 22, 2008, and the service
    bulletins specified in Table 3 of this AD, for related information.

    Table 3–Service Information
    —————————————————————————————————————-
    Revision
    Service Bulletin level Date
    —————————————————————————————————————-
    Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-27A3154. 01 July 25, 2008.

    [[Page 13152]]

    Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27-3110……….. 02 March 2, 2007.
    Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-27A4154. 01 July 25, 2008.
    Airbus Service Bulletin A340-27-4115……….. 01 March 2, 2007.
    —————————————————————————————————————-

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 18, 2009.
    Ali Bahrami,
    Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
    Service.
    [FR Doc. E9-6734 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Air Canada Emergency Landing


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Michael Fast
    What: Air Canada Embraer ERJ-175 en route from Toronto,ON (Canada) to Chicago O’Hare
    Where: near Toronto
    When: Mar 23rd 2009
    Why: After take-off, the crew reported there was smoke in galley and returned to Toronto for a safe landing

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | |

    Airbus Emergency Landing in Montreal


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Mick Bajcar
    What: Air Transat Airbus A310-300, registration C-GTSD en route from Panama City Panama to Montreal,QC Canada
    Where: Montreal, QC Runway 06L
    When: Mar 23rd 2009
    Why: The crew reported an unsafe gear indication on approach, and initiated a go-around. They managed to lower and lock the gear but then nose gear steering was unavailable. They landed safely and had to be towed away, blocking the runway for fifteen minutes.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Unsafe Gear on MD-88 Lands Safely in Guadalajara


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Juan Carlos Guerra – APM
    What: Delta Airlines McDonnell Douglas MD-88 en route from Guadalajara Mexico to Atlanta, GA
    Where: Guadalajara
    When: Mar 24th 2009
    Who: 120 passengers and 5 crew,
    Why: When the crew discovered an “unsafe gear indication” they burned off fuel, (Airport spokesman Miguel Aliaga said the pilot dumped fuel) and requested emergency services to stand by as they undertook an emergency landing on runway 28.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Japan Air Commuter Lands on One Engine


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer James Scott
    What: Japan Air Commuter de Havilland Dash 8-400 en route from Tanegashima to Kagoshima
    Where: Kagoshima
    When: Mar 25th 2009 10:26 a.m
    Who: 42 passengers
    Why: When the left hand engine’s oil pressure dropped, the pilot shut down the engine and continued on to Kagoshima. Maintenance crews discovered significant damage in the engine. There were no injuries reported.

    This was also reported as a Bombardier Inc. DHC-8-Q400. The Bombardier Dash 8 was formerly known as the de Havilland Canada Dash 8; Bombardier acquired de Havilland Canada (DHC) .

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Airbus Birdstrike In Bologna


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Ruby Allesina
    What: Eurofly Airbus A320-200, registration I-EEZI en route from Sharm El Sheikh Egypt to Bologna Italy
    Where: Bologna Italy
    When: Mar 21st 2009
    Why: Bird strike on approach to Bologna. The plane suffered minor damage. No injuries were reported

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • Press Release: S-92TM Helicopter Operators Complying Worldwide With Sikorsky Bulletin on Gearbox Oil Bowl Studs

    March 23, 2009

    STRATFORD, Connecticut – Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. announced today that the majority of the worldwide S-92TM helicopter fleet already has complied with the company notice to retrofit the aircraft’s gearbox oil bowl with steel mounting studs. The company expects to have close to 100 percent compliance by the end of this week. Sikorsky is a subsidiary of United Technologies Corp. (NYSE:UTX).

    The company contacted all S-92 helicopter operators on March 20 after broken titanium studs were found during a helicopter crash investigation in Canada. The investigation is continuing, and no determination has been made that the broken studs contributed to the accident or if they resulted from it. Sikorsky immediately notified the operators as a safety precaution, and the Federal Aviation Administration is expected to issue an Airworthiness Directive instructing the retrofit.

    As of this moment, more than 50 of the 91 S-92 helicopter retrofits were completed. Sikorsky has made available all the parts and tools necessary for all operators to swap out the studs.

    “While the investigation remains ongoing, our priority has been to maintain safety and eliminate any potential risks,” said Marc Poland, Vice President of Sikorsky Global Helicopters. “The operators are reacting quickly, and we are doing all we can to encourage full and rapid compliance.”

    Canada’s Transportation Safety Board (TSB) is leading the investigation into the March 12 helicopter accident that occurred off the coast of Newfoundland and resulted in 17 deaths. Sikorsky is assisting with the investigation.

    “Our prayers and deepest condolences go out to the families of all involved in this terrible tragedy,” Poland said. “The investigation continues, and we are providing support and technical resources to assist the TSB while we continue to support the fleet.”
    The S-92 helicopter was designed with numerous structural and avionics safety features. The worldwide fleet has accumulated more than 140,000 flight hours since 2004. Approximately 66 percent of current S-92 operators are offshore oil customers. The remainder are performing search and rescue (SAR), Head of State, VIP, and airline missions.

    Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., based in Stratford, Conn., is a world leader in helicopter design, manufacture and service. United Technologies Corp., based in Hartford, Connecticut, provides a broad range of high technology products and support services to the aerospace and building systems industries.
    Contacts
    Marianne Heffernan
    Phone: +1 203-386-4373
    Paul Jackson
    Phone: +1 203-386-7143

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Boeing Engine Failure; Emergency Landing in Jakarta


    A Sriwijaya Air Boeing on the runway in Indonesia
    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Peter de Jong
    What: Sriwijaya Air Boeing 737-200 en route from Tanjungpinang airport on Bintan island to the capital, Jakarta.
    Where: unscheduled landing at the nearest airstrip
    When: Mar 23rd 2009
    Who: 116 passengers and 6 crew
    Why: Eight minutes after takeoff, the left hand engine failed with a loud bang. The whole flight took about 27 minutes.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | |

    Airbus Leak Instigates Emergency Landing in South Africa


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Steve Brimley
    What: South African Airways Airbus A319-100 from Johannesburg en route to Port Elizabeth
    Where: OR Tambo International airport.
    When: Monday March 23
    Why: The plane returned to the airport of origin to make an emergency landing due to an oil leak which was said to be non-threatening. Prior to this event, a gauge indicated a pressure problem. The crew shut down one engine when it lost oil pressure.

    Passengers took another plane an hour and a half later.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | | | |

    Fed Ex Crash in High Wind in Tokyo


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Michael Carter
    What: FedEx McDonnell Douglas MD-11F en route from Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport, China to Tokyo-Narita Airport, Japan
    Where: Crash occurred on the runway Tokyo-Narita Airport, Japan
    When: 23 MAR 2009 06:48
    Who: 2 crew members aboard, both fatalities
    Why: The plane landed in high winds, bounced on to the nosewheel, banked left and when the left wing, hit the runway, a fire ensued.

    News Footage includes audio of Bob Francis, former NTSB VC

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Ski Trip Ends in Tragedy



    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Jerry Search
    What: single engine turboprop( Pilatus PC-12) owned by Eagle Cap Leasing en route from Oroville, Calif. (Brown Field Municipal airport in San Diego to Vacaville, Calif. to Oroville ) to Bozeman
    Where: On approach to the Butte airport
    When: Sunday March 22
    Who: 17 Passengers included up to a dozen kids
    Why: Prior to the crash, the pilot diverted from Butte to Bozeman but 500 feet from the airport, a witness said the plane made a number of sharp turns and nosedived into the ground. Seventeen bodies have been recovered, (12 is the upper limit) several more than should be boarded on the type of plane. The cause of the crash is under investigation.Japanese Video

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | |

    Emirates Airbus Tailstrike in Melbourne


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Kris Mogford
    What: An Emirates Airlines Airbus A340-500, registration A6-ERG en route from Melbourne,VI Australia to Dubai United Arab Emirates
    Where: Melbourne Australia
    When: Mar 20th 2009 at 11:30
    Who: 225 on board
    Why: The plane suffered a tail strike on takeoff from Melbourne’s runway 16, climbed and dumped fuel, and when smoke filled the cabin, landed on Melbourne’s runway 34. Damage included some runway lights, damage to the tail skin and access panels.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • Recent Crash Timeline

    2009

    22 March: A small plane crashes shy of the Butte, Montana, airport killing 17 adults and children.

    25 February: Istanbul to Amsterdam crashes shy of the runway at Schiphol international airport. Nine are killed and at least 50 injured. 150 on board.

    12 February: Buffalo, New York, killing 49 people on board and one person on the ground.

    8 February: Amazonas, Brazil, killing 24 people, most of whom were from the same family.

    15 January: A US Airways Hudson River in New York. All 150 passengers, three flight attendants and two pilots are rescued. No loss of life.

    2008

    14 September: Boeing-737 crashes on landing near Perm, Russia killing all 88 passengers and crew members

    24 August: Passenger plane crashes after take-off from Kyrgyzstan’s capital, Bishkek, killing 68 people.

    20 August: Spanair plane veers off the runway on take-off at Madrid’s Barajas airport, killing 154 people, injuring 18.

    2 May: Engine trouble crashes a plane carrying a military delegation west of Juba. 22 dead.

    15 April: DC-9 skids off the runway on take off in Goma Congo during heavy rain, smashing through a wall and into residential area. 40 die

    24 January: Polish Casa C-295M military transport plane crashes killing officials who had attended an air safety conference. Nineteen die.

    2007

    30 November: 56 die on Atlasjet flight when it crashes in Isparta province 7.5 miles from Isparta airport near the town of Keciborlu.

    16 September: 87 people die in One-Two-Go plane crashed bad weather at Phuket Thailand.

    17 July: TAM jet crashes at Congonhas airport in Sao Paulo, in Brazil. All 186 on board die and 13 on the ground.

    5 May: Kenya Airways’ Boeing 737-800 crashes in southern Cameroon swamp, killing 114 on board.

    2006

    29 September: Boeing 737 kills 154 passengers and crew crashed i Amazon rainforest in Brazil, killing all on board, after midair collision.

    27 August: Comair CRJ-100 jet goes down in Kentucky, killing 49.

    22 August: Russian Tupolev-154 passenger plane with 170 people on board crashes north of Donetsk, Ukraine.

    9 July: Russian S7 Airbus A-310 skids off the runway during landing at Irkutsk airport in Siberia 124 on board die. 50 survive.

    3 May: Armavia Airbus A-320 crashes in Black Sea near Sochi, killing all 113.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | | |

    Ecuador Crash Kills 7, Maybe More


    What: twin-engine Beechcraft 200 propeller plane en route from Manta to Quito’s airport
    Where: 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) from the airport near Hotel Quito
    When: 5:20 pm (2220 GMT)
    Who: seven people were killed: 5 aboard; 2 on the ground
    Why: small military plane on a training flight clipped some tree tops and crashed into an apartment building. The reports list two buildings.
    Initial reports said the deaths included the wife and son of the pilot, Major Julio Zaldumbide but we have not verified that information.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | |

    Airbus Generator Fails


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Frank Robitaille
    What: Air Canada Airbus A319-100, registration C-FYNS en route from Liberia Costa Rica to Toronto,ON
    Where: Juan Santamaria International Airport in Costa Rica’s capital city San Jose
    When: Mar 19th 2009
    Why: During takeoff from Liberia, the plane experienced generator failure in its left hand engine. The plane landed safely.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • Tonga: Don’t Fly Here

    AP Video – Thursday, March 19, 2009 at 10:28 EDT

    Scientists sailed on Thursday to inspect an undersea volcano that has been erupting for days near Tonga, shooting smoke, steam and ash thousands of feet into the sky above the South Pacific ocean.

    Don’t fly over Tonga.
    This video of scientists reminds me of watching a guy walk out on a plank and then sawing off the end he’s sitting on. “Run away, better start it up, turn us around already, turn us around, turn us around, get the nose”

    At least they weren’t in a plane…

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Boeing Incident in Brussels


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Mick Bajcar
    What: Ryanair Boeing 737-800 en route from Prestwick in Scotland to Brussels Charleroi in Belgium
    Where: Charleroi Airport in Belgium
    When: Monday March 16 2009
    Who: 157 passengers and crew
    Why: On approach to Charleroi Airport, the crew reported a problem with the braking system. The plane landed safely.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • |

    Cargolux Incident in Maastricht


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Simpsonmeng
    What: Cargolux Boeing 747-400 freighter, registration LX-GCV en route from Nairobi (Kenya) to Maastricht (Netherlands)
    Where: runway 21 Maastricht (Netherlands)
    When: Mar 17th 2009
    Why: After landing, the plane turned, the nose gear went off the pavement and got stuck in the grass. Not the most dignified incident we recorded but hey, it’s a joy to write about something where nobody died

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | | |

    Airbus Hydraulics Failure


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Mark Kopczak
    What: United Airlines Airbus A319-100 registration N836UA en route from Chicago O’Hare,IL to Vancouver,BC
    Where: runway 08R Vancouver
    When: Mar 14th 2009
    Why: After the failure of the hydraulics system on approach to Vancouver, the airbus managed a safe landing.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • | |

    Delta McDonnell Douglas Blows Tires on Landing


    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Joey Collura
    What: Delta Airlines MD88 registration N993DL en route from Rochester to Atlanta
    Where: Atlanta
    When: Mar 14th 2009
    Who: 138 passengers and 5 crew
    Why: On landing, the plane blew two tires and required towing to the gate.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.
  • |

    Pomona Crash


    PICTURED: Piper PA-28
    Click to view full size photo at Airliners.net
    Contact photographer Andrew McMenamin
    What: PA-28 CHEROKEE #129AB en route from Brackett Airfield in La Verne
    Where: NEAR POMONA, CA 2600 block of Pomona Boulevard
    When: 03/14/2009 about 11:15 a.m. Saturday
    Who: two on board, Chuck and Renee Shaffer
    Why: Witnesses report hearing loud bangs just before the plane fell.

    To include the featured image in your Twitter Card, please tap or click their icon a second time.