The UK Airprox Board rules there was a “serious risk of collision” and rates the risk as Category A.
Similar Posts
Lufthansa is Flying Empty Boeing 747 Jumbo Jets Over 2,000 Kilometres Just to Pick Up Fuel Due to Ongoing Shortages
German flag carrier Lufthansa is flying empty Boeing 747-8 jumbo jets more than 2,000 kilometers in order to pick up extra fuel due to an ongoing shortage of jet fuel at South Africa’s largest airport in Johannesburg. The issues at Johannesburg OR Tambo International Airport started on January 4 when a fire at a large…
Trump’s Air Force One upgrade: Qatari royal family to gift Boeing 747-8
The estimated value of the aircraft is approximately $400 million, before any adjustments made by the US Air Force, aviation experts told ABC.
How traveling by plane will change in 2026
Air travel in 2026 will bring nicer planes and airports, fewer budget gains, industry shakeups, and lingering political and economic pressures shaping where — and how — we fly.
Near-miss crash between United flight and helicopter at SoCal airport under investigation by FAA
The FAA is investigating the close call after a Black hawk helicopter crossed into the path of a United Airlines flight.Read More
Media members tour Louisville plane crash site, rebuilding ongoing – WNKY News 40 Television
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WAVE) – More information is now available regarding the recent fatal UPS plane crash in Kentucky. According to a report by WAVE, media outlets were given a tour of the site in Louisville as the rebuilding of the area resumes. Currently, two large wreaths sit in a gravel lot on the property of Grade A Auto Parts. They…
- FAA | News | press release
Press Release: FAA Proposes Civil Penalties Against Five Companies
FAA Proposes Civil Penalties Against Five Companies
WASHINGTON – The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing to assess civil penalties ranging from $50,000 to $70,000 against five companies for alleged violation of the Federal Aviation Regulations or Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations.
$50,000 against Spirit Airlines, Inc., Miramar, Fla., for returning an aircraft to service, and then operating that aircraft on revenue passenger flights when it was not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations. The FAA alleged that Spirit failed to replace a faulty elevator aileron computer (ELAC) after the aircraft experienced an uncommanded pitch down of the nose while operating between Orlando, Fla. and San Juan, Puerto Rico on Aug. 21, 2009. Although Spirit’s maintenance program required replacement of the ELAC computer, the airline did not do so before flying the A321 on a revenue passenger flight the next day from San Juan to Fort Lauderdale, when the aircraft experienced another uncommanded pitch down.
$63,525 against Friendship Airways Inc., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., an air taxi operator, for operating two Cessna 402 aircraft on 77 commuter flights in violation of its air carrier certificate and operations specifications. The FAA alleged that the two aircraft were not authorized for use for the flights between June 21 and July 21, 2008 because they were not listed on the company’s operating specifications for commuter service.
$50,000 against Fleet Aviation of White Plains, N.Y., an on-demand charter and air taxi company, for operating two of its aircraft on 251 flights between June 15, 2009 and March 19, 2010 when crews had not completed the emergency drills required by its training program.
$54,000 against Englund Marine Supply Co. of Astoria, Ore., for offering a package containing flammable gasses and liquids to UPS for transportation by air from Astoria to Rio Vista, Calif., March 26, 2010. The package was discovered leaking at Portland before it was loaded on an aircraft.
$70,000 against Coty, Inc., of New York, for offering a package containing perfume, a flammable liquid, to FedEx for transportation by air from Upland, Calif., to Covington, Wash., March 9, 2010. FedEx employees at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport discovered the shipment leaking.
In all instances of alleged hazmat violations, the materials offered were not properly classed, described, packaged, marked, labeled and in proper condition for shipment under the hazardous materials regulations.
Companies have 30 days from receipt of the FAA’s notice of proposed civil penalty to respond to the agency.
