Agency

Public, government, national and international agencies

  • |

    FAA Proposes $275,000 Civil Penalty Against Continental Airlines

    For Immediate Release
    December 22, 2010

    SEATTLE– The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing a $275,000 civil penalty against Continental Airlines Inc., of Houston, for operating two Boeing 737-900ER (extended range) aircraft on 73 flights when they were not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations.

    The FAA alleges Continental mechanics failed to follow the 737 Airplane Maintenance Manual when they installed incorrect main landing gear wheel-tire assemblies on two aircraft and released them for service on Nov. 7 and 19, 2009.

    The manual contains specific instructions to mechanics not to use wheel-tire assemblies intended for the B-737-700, -800 and -900 on the heavier B-737-900ER. The manual says using the incorrect assemblies on the heavier version of the B-737 might lead to damage to the aircraft or injury to people working on and around the aircraft.

    Continental has 30 days from receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letter to respond to the agency

  • |

    FAA proposes $275,000 civil penalty against Continental Airlines

    For Immediate Release
    December 22, 2010

    SEATTLE– The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing a $275,000 civil penalty against Continental Airlines Inc., of Houston, for operating two Boeing 737-900ER (extended range) aircraft on 73 flights when they were not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations.

    The FAA alleges Continental mechanics failed to follow the 737 Airplane Maintenance Manual when they installed incorrect main landing gear wheel-tire assemblies on two aircraft and released them for service on Nov. 7 and 19, 2009.

    The manual contains specific instructions to mechanics not to use wheel-tire assemblies intended for the B-737-700, -800 and -900 on the heavier B-737-900ER. The manual says using the incorrect assemblies on the heavier version of the B-737 might lead to damage to the aircraft or injury to people working on and around the aircraft.

    Continental has 30 days from receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letter to respond to the agency.

  • |

    FAA Needs To Improve Risk Assessment Processes For Its Air Transportation Oversight System

    On December 16, 2010, we (the FAA) issued our report on the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Air Transportation Oversight System (ATOS). FAA uses ATOS to conduct surveillance of nearly 100 airlines that transport more than 90 percent of U.S. airline passenger and cargo traffic. While ATOS is conceptually sound, our prior reports have found that FAA needs to strengthen national oversight of the system. Following safety lapses at a major airline in 2008, the Senate Committee on Science, Commerce, and Transportation and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure asked us to assess weaknesses systemwide. Accordingly, our audit objectives were to determine (1) whether FAA has completed timely ATOS inspections of air carriers’ policies and procedures for their most critical maintenance systems; (2) how effective ATOS performance inspections have been in testing and validating that these critical maintenance systems are working properly; and (3) how well FAA implemented ATOS for the remaining Part 121 air carriers and what, if any, oversight challenges FAA inspection offices face.

    While FAA has worked to continuously improve ATOS, we found that FAA inspectors did not complete ATOS inspections of air carriers’ maintenance policies and procedures or systems performance on time. In addition, FAA transitioned all of its Part 121 inspection offices to ATOS at the end of 2007, but–due in part to training gaps–some inspectors for smaller air carriers had difficulty adapting ATOS to those carriers’ operations. We made seven recommendations to FAA to improve its data, training, and risk assessment processes for ATOS. FAA concurred with four of our seven recommendations and partially concurred with three.

  • | |

    American Traveling Public Says ‘There Has to Be a Better Way’ to Conduct Air Travel Security Screening

    Overwhelming Majority Support a Trusted Traveler Program That Could Help Spur $84.6 Billion in More Travel

    Blue Ribbon Panel of Experts Convened By U.S. Travel Association to Make Recommendations in Coming Weeks

    WASHINGTON, Dec. 21, 2010 — As airports begin welcoming passengers during one of the busiest air travel periods of the year, a new survey reveals three in four air travelers believe “there has to be a better way” to conduct air travel security screening. Eight in 10 support a trusted traveler program that would provide alternative screening measures for American citizens who submit to a background check and meet other risk criteria. Respondents would take an average of two to three more trips per year if the hassle involved in flying could be reduced without compromising security. Those additional trips would add $84.6 billion in travel spending and support 888,000 additional jobs, according to research from the U.S. Travel Association.

    “Americans are clamoring for a better way, and it should be a wake-up call for our leaders in Washington,” said Roger Dow, president and CEO of the U.S. Travel Association, which commissioned the survey. “An efficient air travel security screening system that streamlines the process for trusted travelers can strengthen our security and economy. Let’s get to work building the system Americans crave.”

    A majority of those surveyed believe Congress should make air travel security a top priority in the new term that begins in January.

    According to the Consensus Research Group, which conducted the survey, “Travelers’ frustration with the system is not limited to just one or two security measures. It is across the board and includes a range of issues.”
    Among the survey findings:

    The U.S. Travel Association has convened a Blue Ribbon Panel for Frictionless Aviation Security comprised of industry and security experts and former government officials. The panel will recommend how to improve air travel security in a way that maximizes security and minimizes the burden on travelers. The panel is expected to issue its report in early 2011.

    The survey was conducted online by Consensus Research Group on behalf of the U.S. Travel Association between November 29 and December 10. The survey includes a nationally representative sample of 1,000 business and leisure air travelers who have flown during the past two years, are aged 25 or older, and who reside in the U.S.

    • Having to remove shoes before going through a metal detector received a higher negative response from those surveyed than newly implemented pat-down body searches by Transportation Security Administration (TSA) personnel.
    • Nearly 9 in 10 respondents believe it is possible to achieve an air travel screening system that is both secure and efficient, while virtually the same number believe if we can put a man on the moon, we can create a passenger security system that doesn’t frighten or inconvenience travelers.
    • Three in four air travelers support recruiting more professional security personnel who are trained to use personal observation, dogs and sophisticated computer analyses that have proven to be effective screening techniques in the past.

    One page summary of the survey:

    Travelers Frustrated with National Air Security System Public Believes “There Has To Be a Better Way”
    Three in four American travelers (75%) believe there has to be a better way to provide air travel security than the procedures used today.
    • Two-thirds of air travelers (66%) believe air travel security is a complicated problem and will not accept heavy-handed procedures unless they are more effective and efficient – 72% of business travelers agree.
    • Eight in ten (82%) agree that if we can put a man on the moon, we can create a passenger screening system that doesn’t frighten or inconvenience air travel passengers.
    More travelers describe the current passenger screening process as “inconsistent,” “stressful,” or “embarrassing” than describe it as being “fair” or “effective.”

    Top ten words air travelers use to describe today’s screening procedures:
    o Inconsistent 64% o Stressful 58% o Embarrassing 41% o Intimidating 40% o Intrusive 39%
    o Fair 30% o Ineffective 29% o Effective 23% o Rude 22% o Frightening 16%
    More would travel by air if the screening process was improved – and the economy would benefit.
    • Nearly two in every three air travelers (64%) said they would fly more if security procedures remained as effective but were less intrusive and less time-consuming.
    • Travelers would take an average of two to three more trips a year (2.48/year) if the hassle could be reduced without compromising security effectiveness. These additional trips could add $84.6 billion in spending and 888,000 more jobs.
    • 80% agree there should be alternative screening measures for American citizens who submit to a background check and meet other risk criteria. In fact, half (50%) of those who have traveled recently “strongly agree” with this.
    • Three in four air travelers (74%) support recruiting more professional security personnel who are trained to use personal observation, dogs and sophisticated computer analyses.
    • A majority of air travelers support common-sense measures such as creating a special security lane for frequent travelers (60%) and a special screening lane for families, infrequent travelers and people who need boarding assistance (58%).
    American travelers believe fixing air travel security should be a top priority in the 112th Congress.
    • A majority of air travelers (54%) believe Congress should make air travel security a top priority in the new term that begins in January.

  • |

    FAA Safety Team | Safer Skies Through Education

    Safety Tip – Airport Surface Deviations
    Notice Number: NOTC2731

    Ground Operations
    As winter gets into full swing across the country we should be aware of its impact on our surface operations at the airport. Operating on a snow or ice covered surface — either in a ground vehicle or an aircraft — requires an extra degree of caution. Movement of ground equipment should be done in a manner that allows you to avoid sliding or skidding into other equipment or aircraft, or skidding across hold lines.

    Extreme caution also is needed when towing an aircraft due to the added weight and the fact that most of the time you are relying solely on the braking action of the tug to stop both the aircraft and the tug. On wet, slick or icy surfaces the aircraft in tow can suddenly jack knife out of control as you turn or attempt to stop.

    The same cautions must also be adhered to when taxiing an aircraft in these conditions. When diminished braking action is present, aircraft can slide off taxiways and runways if one is not careful. When approaching hold lines and turns, be sure to use minimal speed to ensure your ability to come to a stop prior to the hold line or to avoid skidding off the taxiway during a turn.

    As with all ground operations, keep your eyes outside the cockpit while taxiing and adhere to all ATC instructions.

    Additional information about ground operations can be found in chapter 2 of the Airplane Flying Handbook, available at http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/aircraft/airplane_handbook/

  • |

    Harrison Ford

    Wright Memorial Dinner

    Good evening, and thank you, Lisa [Piccione]. I’ve got to tell you … I had to resist the go-to move to, in the interest of safety, to spend some time talking about why doing “Indiana Jones” style stunts in an airplane would be a really, reallybad idea.

    But that’s not what tonight is all about. We’re honoring a pilot, a man who in spite of being a very well known celebrity has used his passion to serve as a springboard for aviation. Even in this room, Harrison Ford’s passion for aviation stands out. When he and I met and talked at a fundraiser at Oshkosh a few years ago, I learned pretty quickly that this is somebody who just loves aviation. Here’s a guy who is on Hollywood’s speed dial, and he wants to talk about hisidea of fun… which is actually a two-parter: flying, or talking about flying.

    In my book, he’s very clearly a student of the craft. Our system is as good as it isbecauseof him and people like him. There’s no special setting for pedigree on the yoke. You have to know your aircraft, and youhave to make sure that you’re both current and qualified when it comes to flying it.

    The good news here is that is exactly what we find in Harrison Ford. I’ve been flying now for almost five decades myself, and after a while you learn that you really can separate the ones that have it from the ones that don’t… Well, trust me, he’s got it.

    There’s a hangar in Santa Monica that shows he’s got it bad for things that fly. Fixed wing and rotorcraft rated. Walk in that hangar, you’ll find a Bell, a Beaver, a Husky, a Bonanza and a Caravan. He’s a one-man air show. That’s the inventory of someone who is a student of aviation.

    But I must tell you, that list of aircraft takes a back seat to what he has given toour industry. As chairman of the Young Eagles, he has been instrumental in giving our youth their first taste of aviation … their first flight. In his case, the word “chairman” was not a ceremonial title. You might expect that as chairman, he might have flow a fewyoungsters by himself. But you know what? He’s actually flown 306 … to be exact. That’s right kids; Han Solo is the pilot in command. Except you can bet those kids didn’t want to be Han Solo. They wanted to be Harrison Ford, the pilot.

    We’re always looking to ways to boost aviation… to inspire the next generation into aviation, especially to the youth of America. Here’s a guy who does it. We’re all about getting more science, more math, more engineering into our school curriculums. With aviation, you can do all three in with just a barrel roll or two. Wall Street can have Michael Douglas. We got Harrison Ford. Score one for aviation.

    Harrison has also been an outspoken advocate for aviation safety. He’s spoken up about runway incursions and airborne turbulence. His ticket shows me enough ratings to know that he’s not casual about aviation … he’spassionate. And when I talk about professionalism, I’m talking about the man we’re honoring here tonight.

    He has given much to aviation, but his legacy will be as a pilot… as an advocate… as a man whose passion is to enjoy the cockpit view of the horizon … and to give others a chance to do the same. And thatis a very fine legacy and certainly worthy of the honor he’s receiving tonight. Thank you.

  • FAA Safety Briefing article Between a Rock and a Hard Spot

    Handling an engine failure inflight is something all pilots are trained to prepare for early on in their careers. But as author and Master CFI Doug Stewart points out in his FAA Safety Briefing article, “Between a Rock and a Hard Spot,” handling a partial power take-off can complicate even a well-rehearsed mitigation strategy. Stewart offers a personal account of a “lessons learned” moment in his Cessna Cardinal RG when he found himself on the back side of the power curve on takeoff, and with trees closing in fast.

    “My best techniques were not enough to overcome the fact that we did not have the power—or airspeed—to climb fast enough to clear the pine trees,” said Stewart. Learning from his experience, Stewart now realizes a ground roll and obstacle clearance calculation would have led him to the correct decision of aborting the flight. “That choice might have led to some damage to the airplane, but it would have kept an abnormal airspeed indication from developing into a life-threatening emergency,” Stewart added. For more on how to best prepare for partial power takeoffs, see the article PDF

  • |

    SAFO: Maintenance of Night Vision Imaging Systems (NVIS)

    Purpose: This SAFO alerts operators of aircraft equipped with a Night Vision Imaging System (NVIS) of
    potential deficiencies in the configuration and condition of installed NVIS equipment.

    Background: Recent Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) assessments of NVIS-equipped aircraft have shown that the likelihood of configuration and maintenance problems increases as aircraft continue in service after NVIS modifications. This means that operators of NVIS-equipped aircraft may not be adequately meeting the inspection and maintenance requirements of NVISs.

    The assessment also concluded that operators are installing light-emitting or light-reflecting equipment, which affects the NVIS compatibility of the aircraft, without ensuring that the equipment is properly evaluated.

    Discussion: The FAA’s Aviation Safety (AVS) organization recently directed a nation-wide sampling of NVIS- equipped aircraft. FAA teams, made up of Flight Standards Service (AFS) inspectors and Aircraft Certification Service (AIR) inspectors/engineers, conducted the sampling and discovered that NVIS-equipped aircraft were frequently out of compliance with NVIS requirements for three primary reasons:
    ? Operators installed light-emitting or light-reflecting equipment that caused the aircraft to no longer be properly configured for use with Night Vision Goggles (NVG);
    ? Operators failed to properly maintain the installed NVIS equipment; and
    ? Flightcrews were aware of conditions that reduced the ability to see necessary instruments/equipment during day, night, NVG-aided, or NVG-unaided flights. Another common problem was improperly filtered light-emitting equipment. Flightcrews did not communicate these discrepancies to the maintenance department or maintenance personnel.

    After assessing and analyzing the data collected, the FAA has determined it is likely that other NVIS-equipped aircraft may not be properly configured or maintained for NVG operations. The term night vision device was intended to include all necessary equipment that is installed or modified as part of the entire NVIS, which includes NVGs. Failure to properly maintain an aircraft’s NVIS configuration and equipment can degrade NVG acuity (i.e., blind spots for flight crewmembers using NVG) and prevent the flightcrew from clearly seeing aircraft instrumentation.
    Distributed by: AFS-200 OPR: AFS-300

    Recommended Action: Directors of Maintenance, Directors of Safety, Directors of Operations, Chief Pilots, mechanics, and pilots operating or maintaining NVIS-equipped aircraft should take appropriate action to confirm the following:
    1. Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) are current, correct, applicable by serial number, and are being properly applied by maintenance departments and personnel. If the ICA has been incorporated into an inspection program, confirm that all the additional ICA requirements are being met;
    2. Installed NVIS equipment are properly maintained;
    3. Maintenance personnel are appropriately trained on the maintenance and inspection of NVIS installations;
    4. Flightcrews fully understand the importance of reporting NVIS-related problems to maintenance personnel;
    5. Aircraft configuration/conformity is periodically checked to ensure that installed NVIS equipment complies with the Supplemental Type Certificate (STC); and
    6. Current and complete data is available to maintenance personnel to support the NVIS equipment.
    NOTE: An aircraft that does not comply with the STC and/or ICA requirements, or that has inoperative or improperly maintained equipment, should not be operated until corrective action has been taken. Operators may use or apply for Minimum Equipment List (MEL) relief as applicable. MEL information is contained in FAA Order 8900.1, Flight Standards Information Management System (FSIMS), Volume 4, Chapter 4, Minimum Equipment Lists (MEL) and Configuration Deviation Lists (CDL), as well as MMEL Policy Letter 127.

    Please visit http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/design_approvals/rotorcraft/nvis/ for additional information on NVIS-equipped aircraft.
    Contact: Questions or comments concerning this SAFO can be directed to your Certificate Holding District Office (CHDO).

  • |

    NASA SELECTS UNISYS FOR SIMULATION, AIRCRAFT TECHNICAL SERVICES

    HAMPTON, Va. — NASA has selected the Unisys Corp. in Reston, Va., to provide simulation and aircraft technical services for the agency’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va.

    The cost-plus-fixed-fee award is valued at $48.5 million over a three-year base period with one two-year option.

    Unisys will provide simulation-related hardware and software technology support services, including analysis, development, verification, validation, operations, maintenance, modification and systems integration for Langley flight simulation facilities and research aircraft systems.

  • |

    NASA NAMES WALEED ABDALATI AS AGENCY’S NEW CHIEF SCIENTIST

    WASHINGTON — NASA Administrator Charles Bolden has named Waleed Abdalati the agency’s chief scientist, effective Jan. 3. Abdalati will serve as the principal adviser to the NASA administrator on agency science programs, strategic planning and the evaluation of related investments.

    Abdalati is currently the director of the Earth Science and Observation Center at the University of Colorado at Boulder. He also is an associate professor in the university’s geography department. Between 1998 and 2008, Abdalati held various positions at NASA in the areas of scientific research, program management and scientific management. His research has focused on the study of polar ice cover using satellite and airborne instruments. He has led or participated in nine field and airborne campaigns in the Arctic and the Antarctic.

    Abdalati will represent all of the scientific endeavors in the agency, ensuring they are aligned with and fulfill the administration’s science objectives. He will advocate for NASA science in the context of those broader government science agendas and work closely with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Office of Management and Budget.

    “We are excited to have Waleed return to the agency during such a critical transition period,” Bolden said. “His experience, wide-range of scientific knowledge and familiarity with NASA will greatly benefit the agency. He will be a true advocate for our many and diverse science research and exploration programs.”

    During his first tenure at NASA, Abdalati served as the head of the Cryospheric Sciences Branch at the agency’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. He also managed the Cryospheric Sciences Program at NASA Headquarters in Washington.

    Abdalati is a fellow of the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, a joint venture between the University of Colorado at Boulder and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. His research examines how and why the Earth’s ice cover is changing and what those changes mean for life on our planet.

    Abdalati received a Bachelor of Science in mechanical engineering from Syracuse University in 1986, a Master of Science in aerospace engineering sciences from the University of Colorado in 1991, and a doctorate in 1996 from the Department of Geography at the University of Colorado, where he was one of the first graduates of the university’s Program in Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences.

    He has published more than 50 peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, and NASA-related technical reports, with approximately 1,500 citations in the peer-reviewed literature. Abdalati has received numerous awards for his research and service to NASA, including the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers, a NASA Exceptional Achievement Medal, and two NASA Group Achievement Awards.

  • |

    NASA PARTNERS WITH COLORADO IN TECHNOLOGY ACCELERATION INITIATIVE

    DENVER — NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver and Colorado Governor Bill Ritter Jr., participated Monday in a Space Act Agreement signing ceremony at the Colorado State Capitol Building in Denver to promote the commercialization of technology developed for the space program.

    NASA’s agreement with the Colorado Association for Manufacturing and Technology (CAMT) created a Technology Acceleration Program and Regional Innovation Cluster for Aerospace and Clean Energy. A manufacturing park focused on rapid new product development and production will be developed to assist growing Colorado businesses.

    “This park will use Colorado’s existing competitive strengths to boost economic growth while creating new jobs and products for aerospace and energy industries,” Garver said. “NASA is pleased to collaborate on new technology developments like the one being created through the Colorado Technology Acceleration Program and Regional Innovation Cluster.”

    Under the agreement, small and mid-sized businesses will have direct access to a NASA “innovation ambassador,” an agency expert who can identify NASA and partner technologies ready for commercialization. The ambassador will conduct forums to drive partnerships among NASA
    and Colorado businesses and help identify businesses that can benefit from commercialization technical assistance.

    “The new agreement with NASA is a perfect fit for Colorado because it will enhance our leading aerospace industry and growing high-tech business and research sectors,” Ritter said. “Most importantly, this will bring high-tech jobs to our state. Colorado is a hub for innovation and continues to attract the best and the brightest workers. Congratulations to CAMT and NASA for making this historic agreement.”

    The Technology Acceleration Program will allow companies to work with NASA and expedite product development from an average of five years to as little as 18 months. New products will get to market more quickly, and new high tech jobs will be created.

    “Aerospace and energy are the fastest growing industries in Colorado, sharing the same supply base and similar workforce needs,” said Elaine Thorndike, chief executive officer of CAMT. “Through regional innovation clusters, public and private sectors can work together to increase business opportunities, technical assistance programs and market penetration for aerospace and clean energy manufacturing strength.”

    The NASA-CAMT partnership will provide technical assistance and identify gaps in commercialization and scouting services to help companies looking for space-developed technologies and services. It will help companies bridge the gap between prototype design, manufacturing and commercialization, while identifying commercial applications for NASA technologies.

    Innovation is necessary to expand the U.S. economy and ensure competitiveness in a global economy. Many new, innovative technologies are developed by small and mid-sized businesses that do not have a robust, in-house product development capability and lack commercialization resources.

    Through the agreement, NASA joins the state of Colorado, the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory and CAMT in a pathfinder collaboration to promote innovation and global competitiveness in the new energy economy.

    CAMT is a statewide manufacturing assistance center dedicated to increasing the competitiveness of Colorado manufacturers. The association is the state affiliate of the national Manufacturing Extension Partnership, a program of the U.S. Department of Commerce.

  • |

    CASA Media Release – Monday 13 December 2010

    New maintenance regulations

    Australia’s aviation maintenance industry will reap a wide range of benefits from a new suite of safety regulations.

    The maintenance suite of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations was made by the Governor General last week and formally registered today.

    It covers continuing airworthiness requirements (Part 42), approved maintenance organisations (Part 145), maintenance personnel licensing (Part 66) and maintenance training organisations (Part 147).

    The new regulations will be introduced from 27 June 2011. The rules covering continuing airworthiness and maintenance organisations only apply to regular public transport aircraft and operations, and are being phased in over two years.

    Revised maintenance regulations for other sectors of aviation such as charter, aerial work and private operations will be developed at a later date, after wide consultation with these sectors.

    All licensed aircraft maintenance engineers will have their licenses re-issued under the new regulations, with current privileges retained.

    CASA will begin a comprehensive information and education campaign early in 2011 to make sure the aviation industry is ready for the new regulations well before the commencement date.

    CASA’s Director of Aviation Safety, John McCormick, said the maintenance suite will bring real benefits to Australian aviation.

    “Safety will be enhanced by ensuring regular public transport operators have a continuing airworthiness management system,” Mr McCormick said.

    “Safety systems and human factors training will be introduced for maintenance organisations which support regular public transport operations.

    “In addition, the new rules are more closely aligned with many other leading aviation nations, making it easier for Australia to do business with the rest of the world.

    “The outcome-based approach of the new regulations means there is a clear focus on safety outcomes at all times, while providing the aviation maintenance industry with flexibility.

    “The flexibility will provide Australia with the ability to respond positively to innovation and technological developments in the future.”

  • December 7: International Civil Aviation Day

    Today is the anniversary of the signing the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The ICAO was formed on December 7, 1944 in Chicago, Illinois establishing the rules of airspace before the creation of the UN. The ICAO now has 190 members.

    In 1994 by ICAO, on the 50th anniversary of the Organization, International Civil Aviation Day was established. The purpose is to reinforce awareness of the importance of aviation in the social and economic development; and promoting ICAO’s commitment to air transport safety, efficiency and regularity.

  • |

    CASA Media Releases Direction for new A380 inspections

    Wednesday 2 December 2010

    The Civil Aviation Safety Authority has issued a direction to Qantas to conduct a further inspection of the Rolls-Royce Trent 900 engines on its A380 aircraft.

    This direction requires Qantas to inspect an oil filler tube that feeds oil to the engine’s high pressure/intermediate pressure bearing structure.

    The oil filler tube inspection must be carried out within two flight cycles.

    Under the direction, Qantas is required to conduct the inspections in accordance with detailed technical information contained in a service bulletin issued by the manufacturer Rolls-Royce this week.

    Inspections will be undertaken using specialist equipment known as a borescope, which is inserted into the oil tube and provides a view of the condition of the wall of the tube.

    Qantas engineers will be looking for any sign of the wall of the tube being out of tolerance and reduced in thickness, which could cause the tube to crack and leak oil.

    Evidence of a problem with the oil tube has been found during the investigation into the Qantas A380 engine failure near Singapore on 4 November 2010.

    The Australian Transport Safety Bureau has identified the condition of the tube as a safety issue and issued a safety recommendation to Rolls-Royce.

    CASA continues to liaise closely with Qantas, the European Aviation Safety Agency, Rolls-Royce, Airbus and the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. In monitoring developments CASA will take any further action that may be necessary in the interests of safety.

  • |

    SINGAPORE PARTNERS WITH ICAO ON AVIATION SECURITY LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT SEMINAR

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    To promote sharing of aviation security knowledge and expertise globally, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) have inked a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to establish the ICAO-Singapore Aviation Security Leadership and Management Seminar (LAMS). Mr. Raymond Benjamin, Secretary-General, ICAO, and Mr. Yap Ong Heng, Director-General, CAAS, signed the MOU today.

    This high-level Seminar will be developed with ICAO and run by the Singapore Aviation Academy (SAA), the training arm of CAAS. It aims to equip senior management of the civil aviation authorities and industry with the knowledge and expertise on aviation security to enable them to effectively carry out their responsibilities as decision-makers. The Seminar also aims to enhance States’ and industry players’ understanding of ICAO aviation security objectives and priorities, international aviation security developments and international best practices.

    The Seminar is targeted at the senior management of governmental aviation organizations, airport authorities, airlines, other relevant aviation industry organizations, and international aviation organizations. The Seminar will be conducted at SAA, and facilitated by aviation security instructors from ICAO and Singapore. The Seminar is scheduled to have its inaugural run in the third quarter of 2011.

    Mr. Benjamin, who is in Singapore under the CAAS Distinguished Visitors Programme (DVP), emphasised the need for such high-level Seminars to enhance global understanding and cooperation in protecting civil aviation from security threats. “Civil aviation threats such as terrorism are global problems that require global solutions. Security measures must therefore be uniform and consistently enforced in all countries to be effective. This can only be achieved with the full cooperation of States, in collaboration with key stakeholders, including industry partners”.

    “Singapore is honoured to partner ICAO in establishing the Aviation Security Leadership and Management Seminar. This Seminar is timely in the light of the evolving security threats and the developments in aviation security globally. It will significantly contribute to States enhancing their aviation security preparedness and capabilities”, said Mr. Yap.

    About the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
    A specialized agency of the United Nations, ICAO was created in 1944 to promote the safe and orderly development of international civil aviation throughout the world. It sets standards and regulations necessary for aviation safety, security, efficiency and regularity, as well as for aviation environmental protection. The Organization serves as the forum for cooperation in all fields of civil aviation among its 190 Contracting States.

    ICAO and Recent Developments in Civil Aviation Security

    At the recent 37th Session of the ICAO Assembly held in Montréal in September/October 2010, Member States endorsed a Declaration on Aviation Security and adopted a proactive Comprehensive Aviation Security Strategy. More recently, the Council of ICAO adopted the 12th amendment of Annex 17 (Security) to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, improvements specifically aimed at strengthening air cargo security measures. In September, a diplomatic conference held in Beijing, under the auspices of ICAO, adopted two treaties to further criminalise acts of unlawful interference against civil aviation.

    Website: www.icao.int

    About the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS)
    The mission of the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) is to “Grow a safe, vibrant air hub and civil aviation system, making a key contribution to Singapore’s success”. CAAS’ roles are to oversee and promote safety in the aviation industry, develop the air hub and aviation industry, provide air navigation services, develop Singapore as a centre for aviation knowledge and training, and contribute to the development of international aviation.
    Website: www.caas.gov.sg

    Founded in 1958, the Singapore Aviation Academy (SAA) is the training arm of CAAS. Over the past 50 years, SAA has established itself as a renowned centre of learning in aviation. It continuously introduces new programmes to address the needs of aviation professionals at all stages of their careers.
    In 2000, SAA was conferred the prestigious Edward Warner Award by the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) for its eminent contribution as a centre of excellence in international civil aviation training. To date, SAA has trained more than 52,000 participants from 190 countries. SAA has currently four specialised schools – School of Aviation Management, School of Civil Aviation Safety and Security, School of Air Traffic Services and School of Airport Emergency

    Services.
    Website : www.saa.com.sg

    About the CAAS Distinguished Visitors Programme (DVP)
    The CAAS Distinguished Visitors Programme (DVP) was established in 2000 to honour outstanding leaders and experts in international civil aviation. The DVP is customised for the invited personality and serves as a unique opportunity for the personality to gain a first-hand understanding of Singapore’s civil aviation landscape, and exchange views with senior transport officials and industry players in Singapore.

  • |

    FAA Raises Safety Rating for Mexico

    December 1, 2010

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) today announced that Mexico complies with international safety standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), based on the results of a November FAA review of Mexico’s civil aviation authority.

    Under the leadership of Secretary Juan Molinar and Director General Hector Gonzalez Weeks, Mexico has made significant progress and is now upgraded from the Category 2 safety rating the country received in July to Category 1. At Mexico’s request, the FAA will continue to provide technical assistance to support and maintain the changes the civil aviation authority has made.

    A Category 1 rating means the country’s civil aviation authority complies with ICAO standards. A Category 2 rating means a country either lacks laws or regulations necessary to oversee air carriers in accordance with minimum international standards, or that its civil aviation authority – equivalent to the FAA for aviation safety matters – is deficient in one or more areas, such as technical expertise, trained personnel, recordkeeping or inspection procedures.

    With the International Aviation Safety Assessment (IASA) Category 2 rating, Mexican air carriers could not establish new service to the United States, but were allowed to maintain existing service. Now with the Category 1 rating, Mexican air carriers can again add flights and service to the United States.

    As part of the FAA’s IASA program, the agency assesses the civil aviation authorities of all countries with air carriers that operate or have applied to fly to the United States and makes that information available to the public. The assessments determine whether or not foreign civil aviation authorities are meeting ICAO safety standards, not FAA regulations.

    Countries with air carriers that fly to the United States must adhere to the safety standards of ICAO, the United Nations’ technical agency for aviation that establishes international standards and recommended practices for aircraft operations and maintenance. IASA information is at www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/iasa/.

  • |

    Driving Toward NextGen

    Williams Trophy Luncheon

    Thank you, David [Whitestone], and thank you to the Washington Airports Task Force for giving me the opportunity to participate in this celebration.

    Make no mistake about this: Gary Kelly and Southwest Airlines are serious. Over the last year and a half, I’ve been making a steady drumbeat for NextGen. Southwest Airlines was in gear for NextGen long before I got here. I can say without hesitation that Southwest Airlines is a leader when it comes to NextGen.

    You can see it in their business operation. They aren’t content with the status quo. They recognize that NextGen is the front door to opportunity; that it’s the key to operating successfully and profitably in a system that doesn’t look like the one from 10 or 20 years ago.

    Gary Kelly and Southwest Airlines and several airlines are saying, “This is not your father’s NAS,” and they’re 100 percent right. NextGen transitions us from an air traffic control focus to a more holistic approach – a system focus that makes full use of all of the technology that’s out there today and will provide benefits from technology that’s yet to come.

    And this didn’t “just happen.” Back in 2008, Southwest committed to NextGen full-bore. This business decision was driven by a difficult economic environment, the high price of gas and competition. When you cut your fuel costs, you boost the bottom line. That’s not high level math, that’s street-smart maneuvering. Southwest committed to upgrade its 737 fleet with required navigational performance capabilities – RNP. They committed to train their aircrews for the performance based navigation operations made possible by NextGen.

    This wasn’t a decision for the faint of heart. They’ve equipped all of their aircraft to be performance based navigation capable. That was $175 million. They’ve trained 6,000 pilots to fly the approaches. In about a month, pilot training should be complete and their pilots will be approved to conduct RNP routes and approaches that require authorization. As part of its internal training plan leading toward operational approval for RNP use, Southwest has a self-imposed requirement to log approximately 3,200 RNAV GPS approaches.

    Southwest Airlines actively supports the FAA in the development and implementation of RNP procedures across the nation, either in the role as lead carrier or as a participant with other operators. Last year, 59 RNP procedures that required special authorization for participating aircrafts and aircrews were published for 15 airports, including 10 served by Southwest. Eventually, these types of procedures will be developed and implemented through a continued collaborative effort, at airports across the country.

    So that’s a mouthful of numbers and acronyms, but what it means is that Southwest Airlines and Gary Kelly understands that the system of tomorrow is hinged on the equipment, and they have no intention of waiting until tomorrow comes to get the new stuff into their cockpits. When they hear “best equipped, best served,” they don’t want to be in that line, they want to be at the front of it.

    None of this is free, and I’ll be the first to admit that if you look back, the FAA has been slow on our promise to deliver the goods. But with NextGen, we are, and let me say without equivocation that Southwest and Gary Kelly are putting their airline in the optimum position to cash in on it and providing incentive for others to match them.

    With both leadership and vision, not only did Southwest commit to this effort financially, but they also did so from a company culture standpoint. From the start, Gary Kelly and Southwest took great pains to educate and motivate their entire work force on the wide-ranging benefits to be gained from becoming a performance-based navigation airline; benefits not only to the company, but to the country as a whole. I’m talking about reduced airspace congestion, more efficient air travel, reduced emissions and a reduced dependency on oil.

    The savings adds up to real money. Performance based navigation means shorter, more direct routes. Southwest figures that for a single minute of time saved on each flight, the annual savings quickly add up to 156,000 metric tons in emissions per year. And $25 million in fuel savings per year. Seconds count.

    At the end of all this, Southwest Airlines will have transformed itself from an airline navigating solely by fixed ground-based navigation aids to one flying satellite-based precise, optimally designed routes that will allow for reduced flight times and contribute to a more efficient national airspace system benefiting the entire U.S. population.

    I’ve been flying in this system for going on five decades now, and I appreciate what Southwest has done. They, and several of their competitors, have shown real leadership in pushing for new technology and the efficiencies that it brings. That’s forward thinking.

    And this kind of approach doesn’t happen in a vacuum. It only happens when an airline like Southwest says, “This is where we need to go, and this is how we’re going to get there.” And then they do it. Congratulations.

  • |

    News Brief: IATA e-freight is live in three more European countries

    Geneva – The International Air Transport Association (IATA) announced today the dawn of a new era for the air cargo supply chain in Romania, Slovenia and Malta. E-freight for imports and exports went live in Romania on November 9, in Slovenia on November 12 and in Malta on November 15.

    Facilitated by IATA, the project is an industry-wide initiative involving customs authorities, carriers, freight forwarders, ground handlers and shippers. E-freight effectively eliminates the need to send paper documents with air cargo shipments, hence streamlining processes, improving speed and reliability and cutting costs.

    In Romania, the e-freight implementation team was led by Air France/KLM, with freight forwarder Schenker. In Slovenia the team was led by Lufthansa in close cooperation with Slovenia Customs and DHL. In Malta the Emirates and Lufthansa were the lead airlines, working closely with in association with BAS Ltd, MAL Services, Servisair Globe Ground, Lufthansa Technik, MITA Technik and Malta Customs.

    Romania, Slovenia and Malta are the 33rd, 34th and 35th e-freight countries worldwide to deliver paper-free cargo. Europe now has 19 countries that are e-freight live. The latest list of live locations includes: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, China, Chinese Taipei, Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dubai, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, Japan, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mauritius, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States.

    The Romanian e-freight implementation team was led by:
    Airlines: Air France/KLM
    Government Entities: Romania Customs
    Freight Forwarder: Schenker

    The Slovenian e-freight implementation team includes the following participants:
    Airlines: Lufthansa
    Government Entities: Slovenia Customs
    Freight Forwarders: DHL

    In Malta the team comprises the following participants:
    Airlines: Emirates, Lufthansa
    Government Entities: Malta Customs
    Freight Forwarders: BAS Ltd, MAL Services
    Ground Handlers: Servisair Globe Ground

    For more information, please contact:
    Chris Goater
    Manager, Corporate Communications
    Tel: +41 22 770 2967
    Email: corpcomms@iata.org

    Notes for Editors:

    • IATA (International Air Transport Association) represents some 230 airlines comprising 93% of scheduled international air traffic.
  • |

    Fact Sheet – Regulating and Licensing Commercial Space Transportation Activities

    Background

    The FAA is responsible for regulating and licensing U.S. private companies and individuals involved in commercial space transportation. To date, the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation has licensed over 200 successful launches.

    Licensing Requirements

    • An FAA license is required for any launch or reentry, or the operation of any launch or reentry site, as carried out by U.S. citizens anywhere in the world, or by any individual or entity within the United States.
    • An FAA license is not required for space activities the government carries out for the government, such as most NASA or Department of Defense launches.
    • Once the FAA determines a license application package is complete, the FAA has 180 days to complete an evaluation and issue or deny a license.
    • The FAA evaluation includes a review of: public safety issues; the activity’s environmental impact; any payload to be flown; any national security or foreign policy concerns, and whether or not the commercial space operator is appropriately insured.

    Experimental Permits

    • To help facilitate in the eventual licensing process, the FAA can issue experimental permits, rather than licenses, for the launch or reentry of reusable suborbital rockets.
    • Experimental permits are issued for research and development; demonstrating compliance with requirements leading to licensing; or crew training prior to obtaining a license.
    • No person may operate a reusable suborbital rocket under a permit for carrying any property or human being for compensation or hire.

    Oversight

    • When an FAA licensed space activity is scheduled, FAA safety inspectors will attend even if it takes place outside the United States.
    • The FAA has the authority to suspend or revoke any license or issue fines when a commercial space operator is not in compliance with statutory or regulatory requirements.
  • |

    Press Release – FAA Proposes $221,650 Civil Penality Against Flying Vikings

    For Immediate Release
    November 29, 2010

    LOS ANGELES – The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes to assess a $221,650 civil penalty against Flying Vikings, Inc. a flight school in Hayward, Calif., for allegedly failing to complete the required training for its staff and failing to maintain training records, as required by Federal Aviation Regulations.

    The FAA alleges that from Feb. 1, 2008 to Oct. 23, 2008, the school did not have a chief instructor, assistant chief instructor or instructor who had completed an approved list of training or refresher courses within the previous 12 calendar months, as required. During that time period, the school provided training to 20 students and graduated 10 of them. The FAA reviewed student records and training during the time the school was not in compliance, and took appropriate action when it found discrepancies, including revocation of one pilot certificate.

    The FAA also alleges that the school failed to properly maintain and certify the training records for 11 students between Feb. 1, 2008 and Sept. 10, 2008.

    “Good solid basic training and accurate pilot records are the foundation for pilots to operate safely throughout their flying careers,” said FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt. “We expect flight schools to help provide that solid safety foundation.”

    Flying Vikings, Inc., has 30 days from receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letter to respond to the agency.

    ###

  • |

    eptember 2010 Passenger Airline Employment Down 0.6 Percent from September 2009

    Tuesday, November 16, 2010 – U.S. scheduled passenger airlines employed 0.6 percent fewer workers in September 2010 than in September 2009, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) reported today. This is the 27th consecutive decrease in full-time equivalent employee (FTE) levels for the scheduled passenger carriers from the same month of the previous year (Tables 1, 2). FTE calculations count two part-time employees as one full-time employee.

    BTS, a part of the Research and Innovative Technology Administration, reported that the September FTE total of 377,676 for the scheduled passenger carriers was 2,248 below that of September 2009 (Table 3). Historic employment data can be found on the BTS web site.

    Five network airlines – American Airlines, US Airways, Alaska Airlines, Continental Airlines and United Airlines – decreased employment from September 2009 to September 2010. The sixth network carrier, Delta Air Lines, after completing its merger with Northwest Airlines, is reporting combined employment numbers in 2010 and reported 8.4 percent more FTEs in September 2010 than the combined totals of both carriers for September 2009 (Table 9). Network airlines operate a significant portion of their flights using at least one hub where connections are made for flights to down-line destinations or spoke cities.

    All seven low-cost carriers reported more FTEs in September 2010 than in September 2009. They are Spirit Airlines; Frontier Airlines; Virgin America Airlines; Allegiant Air; JetBlue Airways; AirTran Airways; and Southwest Airlines (Table 12). Regional carriers Atlantic Southeast, Comair, Horizon Air, Mesa Airlines, Mesaba Airlines, Shuttle America Airlines, and Lynx Airlines reported reduced employment levels compared to last year (Table 15).

    Scheduled passenger airline categories include network, low-cost, regional and other airlines.

    The six network airlines employed 377,676 FTEs in September, 67.7 percent of the passenger airline total, while seven low-cost carriers employed 17.0 percent and 18 regional carriers employed 13.9 percent (Table 4).

    Delta employed the most FTEs in September among the network airlines, Southwest employed the most FTEs among low-cost airlines, and American Eagle Airlines employed the most FTEs among regional airlines. Six of the top 10 employers in the industry are network airlines (Table 6).

    Beginning with October 2007 data, US Airways’ numbers are combined with numbers for America West Airlines in the network category. For previous months, America West’s numbers were included with the low-cost airlines.

  • |

    Press Release – FAA Dedicates Recovery Act Funded Fire Station at LAX

    For Immediate Release
    November 22, 2010

    LOS ANGELES, Calif.–The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) today dedicated a new, state-of-the-art fire station at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) funded by nearly $11 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

    “This project is an example of how the Recovery Act has not only stimulated the economy but also funded a critical safety improvement at one of the world’s busiest airports,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said. “The new fire station will help ensure the safety of all passengers at LAX for years to come.”

    At 27,500 square feet, the new station is twice as big as the old facility, which was built in 1985. The new station better accommodates the size, volume and nature of today’s emergency response equipment. It has seven bays to house and maintain fire rescue vehicles and also provides living, training and administration areas for 14 firefighters.

    “As a former airline pilot, I know very well how important it is for airports to have the best possible emergency response,” FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt said. “That’s exactly what this new station provides for LAX.”

    The new station is located on the airfield midway between the north and south runway complexes. Construction on the station began in the summer of 2009 and was completed in October 2010. Firefighters moved into the station this month.

    Nationwide, $1.3 billion in Recovery Act money has been made available for both airport improvement projects and air traffic control facility and system upgrades. These Recovery Act grants have been distributed to airports that serve commercial passengers, cargo and general aviation.

  • |

    EASA Airworthiness Directive 2010-0242-E (click to view full)

    This EASA Airworthiness Directive was released following an uncontained engine failure of a Trent 900 engine on the Qantas A388 flight near Singapore on Nov 4th 2010, an uncontained engine failure.

    2010-0242-E : Engine – High Pressure / Intermediate Pressure (HP/IP) Structure – Inspections
    Number 2010-0242-E
    Issued by Europe
    Issue date 2010-11-22
    Effective date 2010-11-23
    Contributor EASA Propulsion Section
    Approval Holder / Type Designation ROLLS-ROYCE PLC —RB211 TRENT 900
    Supersedure This AD supersedes EASA AD 2010-0236-E dated 10 November 2010.
    Related information Rolls-Royce RB211 Trent 900 Alert NMSB 72-AG590 Revision 2 dated 18 November 2010. The use of later approved revisions of this document is acceptable for compliance with the requirements of this AD.

  • |

    Press Release – FAA Proposes $140,000 Civil Penalty Against K-Mart, Inc.

    For Immediate Release
    November 19, 2010

    WASHINGTON – The Federal Aviation Administration is proposing a $140,000 civil penalty against K-Mart, Inc., of Royal Oak, Mich., for allegedly violating Department of Transportation hazardous materials regulations.

    The FAA alleges K-Mart offered two packages to UPS for transportation by air from Caguas, Puerto Rico to its returned goods center in McDonough, Ga. The first shipment, Sept. 21, 2009, contained 15 three-ounce containers of nail color, which is classified as paint, a flammable liquid. The second shipment, Oct. 26, 2009, contained 18 five-ounce containers of aerosol sun block, a flammable gas. Neither shipment was declared to contain hazardous materials.

    K-Mart allegedly offered the shipments for transportation by air when they were not packaged, marked, classed, described, labeled or in condition for shipment as required by regulations. UPS employees at the Louisville sort center discovered both packages leaking.

    K-Mart, Inc., has 30 days from receipt of the FAA’s civil penalty letter to respond to the agency.

  • |

    Press Release – FAA Proposes $168,000 Civil Penalty Against Radiology Corp.

    For Immediate Release

    WASHINGTON – The Federal Aviation Administration is proposing a $168,000 civil penalty against Radiology Corporation of America, Inc., of Delray Beach, Fla., for allegedly violating Department of Transportation hazardous materials regulations.

    The FAA alleges Radiology Corp. offered a fiberboard box to Delta Airlines in Atlanta as checked baggage, Feb. 6, 2010. The box housed a soldering iron containing liquid butane fuel, a flammable gas, which is a hazardous material. The shipment was not declared to contain hazardous materials.

    Radiology Corp. allegedly offered the checked baggage for transportation by air when it was not packaged, marked, classed, described, labeled or in condition for shipment as required by regulations. Delta employees at the Atlanta airport discovered the shipment before it was loaded on an aircraft.

    Radiology Corporation of America Inc., has 30 days from receipt of the FAA’s civil penalty letter to respond to the agency.